News1 min ago
So Was This The Correct Decision ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It makes perfect sense to me. It was no different to a player being transferred from Club A to Club B and, while in pre-season training for Club B (without ever having played a match for them), then suffering a an injury which ruled him out of playing professional football ever again. Once a transfer is completed, it's completed. The club releasing the player can't be held responsible for anything that happens after that time.
chelle - // It is a legally correct decision yes. I suppose Cardiff could try to sue the agent or the pilot for their losses. //
They could, but on what grounds?
I think proving that the agent and pilot (well his relatives) deliberately crashed in order to deprive Cardiff of their player would be more than tricky, and even if Cardiff won, I somehow doubt that they could get anywhere near to the money they are trying to claim.
They could, but on what grounds?
I think proving that the agent and pilot (well his relatives) deliberately crashed in order to deprive Cardiff of their player would be more than tricky, and even if Cardiff won, I somehow doubt that they could get anywhere near to the money they are trying to claim.
//They could, but on what grounds?
I think proving that the agent and pilot (well his relatives) deliberately crashed in order to deprive Cardiff of their player would be more than tricky
I didn't say anything about deliberately crashing, that 's just silly. The article in the link says Cardiff's next move would be to go after those responsible for the crash, those persons were operating illegally at the tim
https:/ /www.sk ysports .com/fo otball/ news/11 095/125 68602/e miliano -sala-f ootball er-over come-by -toxic- fumes-b efore-d ying-in -plane- crash-i nquest- jury-co ncludes #:~:tex t=Urugu ay-,Emi liano%2 0Sala%3 A%20Foo tballer %20over come%20 by%20to xic%20f umes%20 before% 20dying ,plane% 20crash %2C%20i nquest% 20jury% 20concl udes&am p;text= Emilian o%20Sal a%20die d%20as% 20a,an% 20inque st%20ju ry%20ha s%20con cluded.
"Pilot and businessman David Henderson, 67, managed the aircraft on behalf of its owner and arranged flights, pilots and maintenance, despite not being the legally registered operator.
A long-time client was Mr McKay, who was helping his son Mark's firm represent Nantes in the transfer.
Mr McKay, who was barred at the time from acting as an agent in the transfer in his own right because he was an undischarged bankrupt, arranged the flights to and from Nantes after Sala had completed a medical in Cardiff."
I think proving that the agent and pilot (well his relatives) deliberately crashed in order to deprive Cardiff of their player would be more than tricky
I didn't say anything about deliberately crashing, that 's just silly. The article in the link says Cardiff's next move would be to go after those responsible for the crash, those persons were operating illegally at the tim
https:/
"Pilot and businessman David Henderson, 67, managed the aircraft on behalf of its owner and arranged flights, pilots and maintenance, despite not being the legally registered operator.
A long-time client was Mr McKay, who was helping his son Mark's firm represent Nantes in the transfer.
Mr McKay, who was barred at the time from acting as an agent in the transfer in his own right because he was an undischarged bankrupt, arranged the flights to and from Nantes after Sala had completed a medical in Cardiff."
Correct decision.
Terms had been agreed, contracts had been signed.
Fifa and now Cas have now ruled against Cardiff. If they don’t start playing by the rules they will get a transfer ban. They have already incurred additional costs.
I would think Cardiff would have had insurance against losing a player, but perhaps they were a bit lax with their admin, and no insurance was in place.
Terms had been agreed, contracts had been signed.
Fifa and now Cas have now ruled against Cardiff. If they don’t start playing by the rules they will get a transfer ban. They have already incurred additional costs.
I would think Cardiff would have had insurance against losing a player, but perhaps they were a bit lax with their admin, and no insurance was in place.
chelle - // I didn't say anything about deliberately crashing, that 's just silly. //
Nor did I suggest that you did.
I was simply illustrating the redundancy in attempting to sue anyone in this issue in the realistic hope of recovering the multi-million pound fee that Cardiff paid for this unfortunate player.
// The article in the link says Cardiff's next move would be to go after those responsible for the crash, those persons were operating illegally at the tim //
And again I reiterate, there is no point at all in suing people who do not have the financial ability to recompense Cardiff, assuming that Cardiff could prove a case.
I suspect Cardiff are simply looking to tie this up in litigation for years - that being cheaper than paying out as the court has instructed.
Nor did I suggest that you did.
I was simply illustrating the redundancy in attempting to sue anyone in this issue in the realistic hope of recovering the multi-million pound fee that Cardiff paid for this unfortunate player.
// The article in the link says Cardiff's next move would be to go after those responsible for the crash, those persons were operating illegally at the tim //
And again I reiterate, there is no point at all in suing people who do not have the financial ability to recompense Cardiff, assuming that Cardiff could prove a case.
I suspect Cardiff are simply looking to tie this up in litigation for years - that being cheaper than paying out as the court has instructed.