Last weekend, we were delivered a Guardian instead of the Mail, and before returning the Guardian and getting the Mail, I had a chance to compare their weekend magazines.
I found it interesting how each clearly appeals to its readership demographic with its cover feature.
The Guardian had Vicky McClure, looking like a Vogue cover shot, cheek bones you could fold a hankie on, eyes to get lost in, a veritable goddess in human form, sexy and modern.
Then came the Mail with Kate Humble, wellies, wax jacket, hair all over the place, no make-up, all countryside and Aga.
I think I might have to change papers, at least at the weekend!!
My Times magazine always goes in the bin. Regardless of who's on the cover.
One week they had what looked like a nude woman on the front, with a modesty strip of paper across the middle.
Reomve the strip as I er, felt bound to do in the interests of research and I was relieved to discover it was still modest :-)
barry - // The Mail has shown Kate in her full glory - I think she is a beautiful woman //
I think Kate is pretty, but she would most likely take you for a yomp through the forest for ten miles, and then rustle up something substantial on the Aga while you wipe the wellies down.
Vicky would stay in by the fire and slowly make you feel like you'd had a yomp for ten miles, and then probably keep on until you begged for mercy!!!!!