News3 mins ago
Can A Relative With The Same Surname Witness A Signature On A Mortgage Deed?
I have searched online and still unsure. Always find it annoying to have to get a witness to a signature on a legal document and if I am honest I find it a bit awkward to ask people. Can a family member be a witness,e.g my 19 yr old son? Is there anything on a web-site that says it is legally ok?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ganesh. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.yes but it will raise questions about whether they are a relative and whether they have an interest. Oh a son isnt suitable - he is likely to have a financial interest as an heir..
.I regularly get my neighbours or work colleagues
It is intended to be like this by the way
so that if the signature is queried - the situation is so awkward that everyone remembers it.
I agree Smiths of this world are in difficulty
and the Ponsonby Goodbody Smyths arent -
.I regularly get my neighbours or work colleagues
It is intended to be like this by the way
so that if the signature is queried - the situation is so awkward that everyone remembers it.
I agree Smiths of this world are in difficulty
and the Ponsonby Goodbody Smyths arent -
If that was true- that there is 'no onus on the witness' other than signing to say they witness that person's signature, then legally there should be no reason whatsoever to say that a relative can't sign it. It makes no sense logically to prohibit this. And I still can't find anything that says this.
According to this website, No.
http:// www.act legal.c o.uk/fa q/buyin g-house -faqs/4 1/
I have witnessed signatures on a mortgage deed – the witness is not acting as a guarantor or anything like that – only confirming that they know those signing (are who they say they are).
I can only assume that the purpose of witnessing the signatures, is a poor attempt to minimise fraud involving the mortgage.
http://
I have witnessed signatures on a mortgage deed – the witness is not acting as a guarantor or anything like that – only confirming that they know those signing (are who they say they are).
I can only assume that the purpose of witnessing the signatures, is a poor attempt to minimise fraud involving the mortgage.
No. It should not be done. But there's no significance in witnessing a signature other than that the witness is saying that the other person signed in his or her presence. It should not be a close family member on such a document as this because they may have an interest of some sort and cannot be regarded as independent anyway.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.