That's What You Call A Near Miss!
ChatterBank0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by hugoboss. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I would write to them (not email) explaining that despite any contract conditions purporting to tie you to a certain number of payments or length of contract, the Company can by its own admission no longer fulfil its side of the bargain. Unless you were told specifically at the time of enering into the contract that your changing to NTL and their not being able to supply their service via that particular conduit, then there is really no argument.
Even if they did include that NTL provision from the start, I don't suppose any court would uphold it as it is grossly unfair.
Stick to your guns and point out that, as they can no longer supply the service and they have effectively broken the contract, you are no longer obliged to make any more payments. Instruct your bank not to honour any more requests for payment and ask the Company to refund the money they have taken from you since they became unable to supply the service.