Is Keir Starmer Really Going To Arrest...
News3 mins ago
1500gb hard drive is only 1360gb...is that acceptable?
11 Answers
ive just bought a hard drive advertised as 1500gb ...however on plugging it in it is only 1360gb ... 14gb less...
is that normal for a drive of that size...?
now i know that most drives are just under the amount they claim to be and have yet to see one that registers exactly...but 14gb under seems rather a lot...
there is no software - its just plug and play - so why so much?
cheers
is that normal for a drive of that size...?
now i know that most drives are just under the amount they claim to be and have yet to see one that registers exactly...but 14gb under seems rather a lot...
there is no software - its just plug and play - so why so much?
cheers
Answers
1 to 11 of 11
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by joko. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It's about right, dues to the difference in the way that Hard disk manufacturers calculate the size of a Gigabyte compared with the way normal people calculate it.
i.e: Real Gigabyte = 1 073 741 824 bytes
Hard disk manufacturer's Gigabyte = 1 000 000 000 bytes
It's a good thing that (say) Petrol companies don't have their own method of calculating a litre :-)
i.e: Real Gigabyte = 1 073 741 824 bytes
Hard disk manufacturer's Gigabyte = 1 000 000 000 bytes
It's a good thing that (say) Petrol companies don't have their own method of calculating a litre :-)
The problem is how the hard disk makers measure a gigabyte. Hard disk makers tend to "round up" the figure to make them simpler (and make the hard disk seem bigger).
For techincal reasons computers use a measurement of 1024 (so a kilobyte is 1024 bytes, a megabyte is 1024 kilobytes, and a gigabyte is 1024 megabytes). This makes a gigabyte 1,073,741,824 bytes.
But a hard disk makers will call a gigabyte 1,000,000,000 bytes to make it simpler.
So if you compare the "real" 1,073,741,824 bytes to the 1,000,000,000 bytes that the HDD manufacturers use, you can see that there is over a 7% difference! Therefore Windows will report the hard disk as being approximately 7% smaller than the hard drive manufacturer's quoted size.
For techincal reasons computers use a measurement of 1024 (so a kilobyte is 1024 bytes, a megabyte is 1024 kilobytes, and a gigabyte is 1024 megabytes). This makes a gigabyte 1,073,741,824 bytes.
But a hard disk makers will call a gigabyte 1,000,000,000 bytes to make it simpler.
So if you compare the "real" 1,073,741,824 bytes to the 1,000,000,000 bytes that the HDD manufacturers use, you can see that there is over a 7% difference! Therefore Windows will report the hard disk as being approximately 7% smaller than the hard drive manufacturer's quoted size.
'Kilo' means 10 to the power of 3. (i.e. 1000). However computers use binary arithmetic. Those who work in the field quickly decided that it would make more sense to interpret 'kilo' as meaning 2 to the power 10 (=1024), rather than as 1000. Following on from that, 'Mega' came to be interpreted as 2 to the power of 20 (= 1,048,576), rather than as 1,000,000, for computer purposes. As the numbers used by computer designers got bigger, it then followed on that 'Giga' came to mean 2 to the power of 30 (= 1,073,741,824), rather than as 1 billion.
So a hard drive which has 1500 billion (real) bytes will have {1500 divided by 1.073741824} (computer) Gigabytes, which is about 1397 (computer) GB. That would partially account for the apparent deficit which you've reported. However I suspect that the '1500' in the description might actually refer to 1.5 x 2^10, rather than 1.5 x 10^3. In which case, a factor of 1.024 needs to be brought into the calculation, giving a disk size of roughly1364 (computer) GB. That would certainly be the case if the drive was actually described as '1.5 Terrabytes'.
It has always been the convention that hard drive manufacturers will report the true number of bytes available on their products, even though the computers that those drives are placed in will then report a lower figure (because the computer requires 1024 bytes to make up one Kilobyte, rather than 1000). As drive sizes get bigger, the differences become more marked.
Chris
So a hard drive which has 1500 billion (real) bytes will have {1500 divided by 1.073741824} (computer) Gigabytes, which is about 1397 (computer) GB. That would partially account for the apparent deficit which you've reported. However I suspect that the '1500' in the description might actually refer to 1.5 x 2^10, rather than 1.5 x 10^3. In which case, a factor of 1.024 needs to be brought into the calculation, giving a disk size of roughly1364 (computer) GB. That would certainly be the case if the drive was actually described as '1.5 Terrabytes'.
It has always been the convention that hard drive manufacturers will report the true number of bytes available on their products, even though the computers that those drives are placed in will then report a lower figure (because the computer requires 1024 bytes to make up one Kilobyte, rather than 1000). As drive sizes get bigger, the differences become more marked.
Chris
-- answer removed --
The use of kilo to represent 2^10 (and the associated Mega and Giga multipliers) was an ad hoc implementation.
By definition Kilo means one thousand, Mega is one million and Giga is a billion. These are standards defined by the SI authority. Unfortunately their use in the binary context became widespread before the SI authority became aware of the misuse.
The use of the binary variant was never approved. Consequently their use in the binary form is incorrect and the usage by disk drive manufacturers is wholly legitimate.
The terms kibi, mibi and gibi have been approved by SI for the binary based multipliers but have not been adopted by the industry.
However, strictly speaking, when a disk drive is referred to as 140 GB it means 140 Gigabytes while 1 GB of RAM is one Gibibyte
By definition Kilo means one thousand, Mega is one million and Giga is a billion. These are standards defined by the SI authority. Unfortunately their use in the binary context became widespread before the SI authority became aware of the misuse.
The use of the binary variant was never approved. Consequently their use in the binary form is incorrect and the usage by disk drive manufacturers is wholly legitimate.
The terms kibi, mibi and gibi have been approved by SI for the binary based multipliers but have not been adopted by the industry.
However, strictly speaking, when a disk drive is referred to as 140 GB it means 140 Gigabytes while 1 GB of RAM is one Gibibyte
1 to 11 of 11
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.