I like watching Wimbledon, but can't understand the BBCs love of John McEnroe.
As a player he may have been talented. but what a whingeing, whining brat he was. I went to Queens Club years ago when he was playing, and he was just constantly annoying with his challenge of almost every ball that went anywhere near the line. That night on TV he said he thought the spectators were ignorant about tennis. I'm still waiting for an apology from him, especially as I contributed to his match fee!
Now the BBC has him on TV commenting on Wimbledon! I try to avoid any match when he's part of the commentary team, although if Murray reaches the final I'll have to grin and bear it and turn the sound down.
I bet if Hawkeye had been around in his playing days, he would still have disputed its decisions!
I agree. He annoyed me intensely as a player but his commentaries tend to be intelligent and humorous - like many ghastly teenagers/young men, he has grown up and turned into a fairly likeable human being.
From what I've seen, when he plays in the Seniors/Past Champions type events he is just reverting to type, playing to the crowd and the umpire.
Nastase used to do much the same thing.
It's obvious that most of it is half-hearted appealing.
As for commentating he is one of the best and clearly a crowd favourite. He obviously loves Wimbledon and that feeling is, in the main, reciprocated.
I think that in general the commentators / color people in tennis tend to be really droll and despite what a whiner he was (and... YES .... he was such a cry-baby) John tends to have more to say than many of the other former players tapped to talk about the sport.
like others have said,despite disliking him intensely when he played wimbledon,i always enjoy his down to earth commentary now. The boy grew up and learned manners it seems. Get over yourself and live your own life now!