ChatterBank2 mins ago
When Is A Sport Not A Truly Competitive Sport?
32 Answers
To me, it's not a competitive sport if it isn't measured purely objectively - faster/higher/further etc.
As soon as you introduce subjective elements it becomes something entirely different - aesthetically beautiful or technically accurate it may be, but it's not a true competitive sport.
So I have lots of problems with the Winter Olympics - the skiing is pure sport, but the ski-jumping is not. The speed skating is OK, but the 'poncing around on ice' (aka ice dance etc) really isn't. The curling and bi-athlon are great, but the 'showing off on a snowboard' is much less satisfactory.
I'm in no way demeaning the skill of the participants in the 'subjectively marked' events - I just wish there was a better/different name for them.
As soon as you introduce subjective elements it becomes something entirely different - aesthetically beautiful or technically accurate it may be, but it's not a true competitive sport.
So I have lots of problems with the Winter Olympics - the skiing is pure sport, but the ski-jumping is not. The speed skating is OK, but the 'poncing around on ice' (aka ice dance etc) really isn't. The curling and bi-athlon are great, but the 'showing off on a snowboard' is much less satisfactory.
I'm in no way demeaning the skill of the participants in the 'subjectively marked' events - I just wish there was a better/different name for them.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sunny-dave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Absolutely - any competition whose result is a "matter of opinion" is a complete waste of time (even boxing).
When I was a boy my parents were friendly with a couple who bred spaniels for competition. They would go to a show, see who the judges were and say "3rd this time" or "we will win today". I've had no faith in judges competition since then.
When I was a boy my parents were friendly with a couple who bred spaniels for competition. They would go to a show, see who the judges were and say "3rd this time" or "we will win today". I've had no faith in judges competition since then.
Totally agree. Generally, I tend to think of sport as being actively competitive between participants and anything else as a game. Golf is a game as the golfers are always playing the course with their own set of skills and not their opponent(s). Same with darts, archery, shooting etc. They always play the board or target.
Agree with all that's been said,it's time the word sport was redefined. My dictionary describes it as "An athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive nature". So far so good but it then lists sports and includes fishing--athletic??. Perhaps fighting a barracuda might be described as energetic but sitting on a river bank with a flask and sandwiches should not be considered a sport.
I agree - by my tight definition anything with a referee/umpire is not a true, objective sport.
I think I'm less worried about an official applying "the rules of the game", although that can get pretty partial (just think "Pakistani Cricket Umpire" before we moved to neutral officials).
It's the 'artistic impression' and 'style' stuff that I don't like very much.
I think I'm less worried about an official applying "the rules of the game", although that can get pretty partial (just think "Pakistani Cricket Umpire" before we moved to neutral officials).
It's the 'artistic impression' and 'style' stuff that I don't like very much.
Some red herrings seemed to be thrown into the debate. In amateur boxing they do attempt to count the number of valid punches, so they have tried to eliminate the subjective aspect of scoring. With judo there are a fixed set of points for the different throws achieved. Football is all about the number of goals scored.
-- answer removed --
Hoppy - apologies for the late reply - I was in transit (or easyjet to be more precise).
I think T&D were brilliant and deserved their World Championships ... but their event should not have been at the Olympics, which should be above such subjective events.
The Olympic motto is "Citius, Altius, Fortius" - which is Latin for "Faster, Higher, Stronger" - it doesn't seem to have been designed to include "Prettier, Smilier, Poncier" and should stick to stuff that can be measured - not marked on the whim of judges.
I think T&D were brilliant and deserved their World Championships ... but their event should not have been at the Olympics, which should be above such subjective events.
The Olympic motto is "Citius, Altius, Fortius" - which is Latin for "Faster, Higher, Stronger" - it doesn't seem to have been designed to include "Prettier, Smilier, Poncier" and should stick to stuff that can be measured - not marked on the whim of judges.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.