Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Is There Something Not Quite Right Here?
54 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 81292/P olice-l et-gyps y-famil y-stay- couples -30-000 -stolen -carava n-movin g-breac h-human -rights .html
Here we have a couple who have had their caravan stolen, and a travelling family who are in possession of the said stolen caravan, yet the police have no lawful rights to recover the couples property, why?
Here we have a couple who have had their caravan stolen, and a travelling family who are in possession of the said stolen caravan, yet the police have no lawful rights to recover the couples property, why?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
The family with two young children may - for all we know - be completely unaware this is a stolen caravan. You might be quite happy to de-home them, but this is not within the police powers - not without getting courts and other agencies involved and arranging alternate accom all at extra cost to tax payer.
I wonder if the opportunist thief knew that they were 'between' insurance policies.
I wonder if the opportunist thief knew that they were 'between' insurance policies.
The article may give information but I suspect the question meant, why do the police believe they have no lawful powers to retrieve stolen property, or worse, why do they not have such powers ?
The thieves have no need of it as they will be held in the gaol, and if granted bail can go find a family member of friend to take them in.
The thieves have no need of it as they will be held in the gaol, and if granted bail can go find a family member of friend to take them in.
When my mother moved house the time before this she rented a building and put a lot of items into storage worth a considerable amount of money. When she went to retrieve the items they were all gone. The owner of the building said he 'thought she had collected them' but had several identifiable items inside his house and garden, so my mother called the police who first told her on the phone it was 'civil' and when she rpessed them finally took a stement and 'investigated' the allegation of theft. This was done by going to have a chat with the owner who told them he ' thought she had collected her belongings' and denying the things she identified as hers were hers claiming he had bought them all second hand. Apparenlty this was enough not to pursue the matter as the police said ' He said he didn't do it'. Really? A theif says he didn't steal soemthing so it must be the truth? She had all the same ' not within our powers' thing thrown at her and was told if she went to retrieve her goods they would consider it theft and possibly a breach of the peace if things got nasty. She is presently suing him. The police are useless.
The police sound like a complete shower of sh1te when it comes to dealing with ..er...crime. Except for motoring offences of course. Sitting in a van at the side of the road with camera and a cheese sandwich is pretty easy, and there's a good clear up rate.
The only point reporting anything stolen to them is because it's a requirement of being able to claim the insurance.
The only point reporting anything stolen to them is because it's a requirement of being able to claim the insurance.
i understand why they cant just be turfed out on the street (even though they deserve it) as they have kids - but the police should have immediately moved them into temp accommodation until they find somewhere else, not just shrug it off
the problem is now, the caravan will be gone.. they will have scarpered by now and they wont be able to get it back at all
the police, in this instance are a shambles
the problem is now, the caravan will be gone.. they will have scarpered by now and they wont be able to get it back at all
the police, in this instance are a shambles