would it bother you if there was a full bodyscan at airports/

[Bobbisox]

I wouldn't be bothered one bit but already "they" are lining up to oppose it, and by they I mean civil liberties garbage, yet the Netherlands have brought in in, said "This is the way it's going to be "...end of !!!
Why are we so wimpish? I would feel safer flying with thorough checks, wouldn't you?
Ther is a problem I accept, with different cultures, I don't know how that could be addressed, but Holland must also have different cultures too. I don't think it is ethnic minorities kicking off about it, but the same ones that oppose carrying IDs, Not sure what the answer to it is.

Bobbi ♥

[David Black]

Nope I would be delighted as long as its quick.

[Bobbisox]

I would imagine it would initially cause a hold up David, but I would feel it worthwhile for safety reasons
Bobbi ♥

[Everhelpful]

No,wouldn't bother me at all.

[Bobbisox]

that would be nicer Mrs M , I agree..LOL

[Bobbisox]

didn't know the time scale slegsy buy I believe it is being tested at Manchester since the Detroit incident

[NoMercy]

I would not be bothered at all. As a frequent flyer, I am willing to tolerate anything that ensures our safety in the skies.

[ComfortablyNumb]

There has been a stink over this scanner for some time. Will the people who operate it have a police check

http://news.sky.com/s...200910215405871?f=rss

[sophie_1003]

I would prefer it if they do the proposed idea of having the person looking at the images in a different part of the building, still wouldn't like it vert much but worth putting up with for a holiday in the sun once a year!

[snags]

Can I go through twice? ;-p

[Bobbisox]

I would imagine they would have to Com, numb

[Bobbisox]

why snags, just incase they didn't believe the image they saw first time around..LOL

[vulcan]

The Russians are already using a very effective screening system. It uses radio waves and shows the operator a very detailed image. however your doctor would see more and that doesn't bother us so why get upset over a stranger seeing the same. After all they are both trying to save our lives. Given the choice I'd rather be embarrassed then dead.

[mrs.chappie]

It wouldn't bother me at all. Anything that makes travel safer .... I say bring it on!

[Bobbisox]

right on target vulcan, terrorism is with us for keeps, so would I rather have it done

[Bobbisox]

But it still begs the Qs, How would different religions react, and I have to say, I see their argument

[ComfortablyNumb]

slegsy there was a lot about this scanner in the Manchester Evening News. have you a link to this 95% who were in favour

[tara20]

I have no problem with checks (if anybody found mine interesting I'd be very surprised)
But if children are (quite properly) exempt, could this lead to terrorist misusing children as carriers? It doesn't bear thinking about but they have no scruples.