@jno
Thanks for that link.
//"The House of Lords has an important job as a chamber that says 'have you thought about this' or raises concerns and there were opportunities for the House of Lords to do that yesterday.
"They didn't take those opportunities"//
When all is said and done, that lack of debate, on this occasion (if that is a fair assessment of a session I have not seen for myself), needs further attention.
In case that is ambiguous I mean the WTC cuts need their proper share of Lords scrutiny and there needs to be an additional enquiry into why this didn't occur, first time around.
The short version is that the Lower House chose to take a shortcut, to stifle debate and the Lord's said "ahem" and sent it back to be done properly, as a Finance Bill.