Mitolyn Reviews | Washington D.c. Us, -...
Gaming4 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by mandie73. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.They are playing some dates later on this year:
http://www.ticketmaster.ie/artistsynopsis/735218
http://www.ticketmaster.ie/search?tm_link=tm_header_search&keyword=guns+n+roses
No and no. The internal struggles that split the original line-up - particularly the controling attitude of Axl Rose show no sign of having been addressed. The majority of the historic line-up are no quite happy in another band, and Axl Rose is taking out a few musicians he likes recording with at the moment, and calling it Guns 'n' Roses.
If the original line-up were to reform, it wouldn't be Guns 'n' Roses, it would be a group of musicians who used to be Guns 'n' Roses - the logic is a firm reason why most 'reformations' should be left alone. As the voice in Don Henley's head so wisely told him "Don't look back, you can never look back ...."
Legendary bands should leave their legend frozen in time, not embarass everyone by trogging round in an old-and-frankly-disinterested-but-we-need-the-money shambles posing as a 're-formed' band.
I really can't believe that they are charging �37.50 a ticket for their warm up London Show before Download.
I mean if it were the original line-up (which wouldn't happen) then mybe that would be justified...but charging that just to see Axl Rose and a bunch of session musicians essentially is well out of order. (especially when it only cost �22 to see Velvet Revolver last year)