ChatterBank1 min ago
Anonymous On-Line Activists Declare War On Isis.
7 Answers
I've heard on news programmes that ISIS have a very slick on-line presence. It's used for propaganda, recruiting, and the like.
Why should it be up to a group of 'activists' to take them on?
http:// www.msn .com/en -gb/new s/uknew s/anony mous-de clares- war-aga inst-is is-afte r-bruss els-att acks/ar -BBqQXL O?li=BB oPWjQ
Why should it be up to a group of 'activists' to take them on?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It shouldn't be up to vigilantes but we're unlikely to hear any details of what the security services are doing. This isn't the first time that Anonymous have declared war on ISIS e.g after the Charlie Hebdo shooting over a year ago https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Anony mous_(g roup)#C harlie_ Hebdo_s hooting s . Have they managed anything other than some minor or short-lived inconveniences?
The conventional security services might prefer that some of those sites are left online because:
(a) they'll be monitoring them for indications of where the next terrorist targets are most likely to be ; and
(b) they'll be seeking to infiltrate terrorist networks through them by pretending to be terrorist sympathisers themselves.
So Anonymous could actually be harming counter-terrorism activities by attacking such websites.
(a) they'll be monitoring them for indications of where the next terrorist targets are most likely to be ; and
(b) they'll be seeking to infiltrate terrorist networks through them by pretending to be terrorist sympathisers themselves.
So Anonymous could actually be harming counter-terrorism activities by attacking such websites.
sandyRoe
How do we know that Anonymous,in their heroic acts of self aggrandisement, are not screwing up the long standing efforts of international security monitoring stations i.e. GCHQ. By interfereing with on-line communications by jamming or whatever they could well be causing more harm than good.
This group is nothing but a group of trouble makers.
Anons have publicly supported WikiLeaks and the Occupy movement. Related groups LulzSec and Operation AntiSec carried out cyberattacks on US government agencies, media, video game companies, military contractors, military personnel, and police officers, resulting in the attention of law enforcement to the groups' activities. Some actions by the group have been described as being anti-Zionist. It has threatened to cyber-attack Israel and engaged in the "#OpIsrael" cyber-attacks of Israeli websites on Yom HaShoah (Holocaust Remembrance Day) in 2013.[8]
How do we know that Anonymous,in their heroic acts of self aggrandisement, are not screwing up the long standing efforts of international security monitoring stations i.e. GCHQ. By interfereing with on-line communications by jamming or whatever they could well be causing more harm than good.
This group is nothing but a group of trouble makers.
Anons have publicly supported WikiLeaks and the Occupy movement. Related groups LulzSec and Operation AntiSec carried out cyberattacks on US government agencies, media, video game companies, military contractors, military personnel, and police officers, resulting in the attention of law enforcement to the groups' activities. Some actions by the group have been described as being anti-Zionist. It has threatened to cyber-attack Israel and engaged in the "#OpIsrael" cyber-attacks of Israeli websites on Yom HaShoah (Holocaust Remembrance Day) in 2013.[8]
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.