“…in order to ensure the NHS remains the envy of the Western world that we know it to be.”
Alas the NHS is not the envy of the western world (and it’s doubtful if it ever was, though that claim to fame must have receded from being likely long ago). The term is often bandied about by those who refuse to accept that, in its current form, it is not sustainable.
The UK currently ranks 15th in the league table of European health services. It ranks below (among others) France (1st), Italy (2), Andorra (4), Malta (5), Spain (6), Portugal (9), Greece (11) and Iceland (12). Noticeably all of those ranking above the UK have a percentage of public funding below that of the UK (some significantly so). In fact all those below the UK do as well and at 96.9% publicly funded the UK has the highest percentage of publicly funded healthcare in Europe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Europe
France, top of the league, only funds 76.9% of its healthcare from the public purse. Most other nations seem to have realised that the idealistic notion of funding virtually all healthcare from public funds is simply not possible. The reckless pursuit of that ideology has caused enormous problems for the NHS. Anybody who has had any experience of some other European healthcare services will realise that the NHS is not the “envy of the world”. It is not even the envy of Europe. It does some wonderful work. But it also provides some appalling levels of service. It must fundamentally change its model and move away from its “free at point of delivery” dogma if it is to provide a health service people of the UK deserve.