tonyav at 00:19 today: “looks like he's going to put a complaint in against the police.”
Me at 14:14 last Thursday: “…and a decent brief would now be making plans to take action for wrongful arrest.”
The police – and in particular the Met – are very fond of “easy meat”. It’s comparatively easy to sit in an office and trawl through inane “Twits” and Facebooks or whatever and rumble a few “serious offences” here and there (which are in effect stupid rantings with no particular victims). The Met say they are stretched. Well it’s not surprising if they devote their meagre resources to pursuing this sort of nonsense.
Of course I doubt Mr Doyle’s action will succeed: “We have a duty to follow up all allegations, etc. etc”. I’m not too sure who made what allegations but whatever they were. But I doubt they justified the trashing of Mr Doyle’s flat and the confiscation of his computer in their relentless pursuit of “evidence” to support a charge (under legislation designed to thwart terrorism) that they had no right to bring.