Donate SIGN UP

Katie Hopkins Has Got It About Right Once Again.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 08:35 Mon 28th Mar 2016 | News
33 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3511654/KATIE-HOPKINS-real-threat-not-far-right-s-smug-left-did-acceptable-water-cannon-people-standing-country-turning-blind-eye-destruction-Europe.html

Following on from yesterdays thread regarding the so called 'fascist thugs', look at the bigger picture.

When has it been right to use water cannons on protesters who are concerned about what is happening to their country?

Can never remember the water cannons coming out when the Muslims took to the streets over the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 33 of 33rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I just read a comment regarding some alleged recent ISIS threat on our capital. Well tell us something we don't know or expect!
It was said by a reader. Funny how these threats by ISIS are not aimed at Russia. I note that their appears to be no misbehaviour in Russia with respect to Muslims.
Could it be that Putin actually cares for his country and is a little more robust if any 'guests' become a continual everyday nuisance as they seem to be in the rest of Europe.
Boris wanted his Water Cannon. Other European countries use their watercannons
It would appear Mr Putin has no need for them ??? Why is that do you think ???
Yes........understood perfectly....you can't produce evidence...if you could,
you would have already done so !

So...cast aspersions and insults but then "can't be asked" to explain !

Its a simple case of put or shut up Baldric !
Retro...it might be that Putin will send in troops instead, like he did in the Ukraine.
//Funny how these threats by ISIS are not aimed at Russia.//

Retro, google "Caucasus Emirate". Russia has its own internal problem.
Mush...I had forgotten that ! I recall that a terrorist outrage was committed at a Moscow cinema or theatre a few years ago, by Chechen rebels, if my memory serve me right ::::

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_theater_hostage_crisis

Not forgetting the outrage at the school in Breslan :::

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beslan_school_siege

And the more recent Metro bombings :::

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Moscow_Metro_bombings

You wonder how Russia has the time and energy to send its troops 1000's of miles away to the Middle East when it has such pressing problems closer to home.

Mikey, precisely what has she said that you disagree with?
She is giving succour to the Far Right and Fascism, by refusing to condemn the activities of these thugs.
//She is giving succour to the Far Right and Fascism, by refusing to condemn the activities of these thugs. //

.....and yet you say that those who fail to condemn terrorist atrocities are not giving succour to the terrorists?

wouldn't that be double standards?
Mikey, I didn't asked for your opinion - I asked you to tell me precisely what she's said that you disagree with.
The main thing I don't like about her ignorant rhetoric is where she writes:
The police have an almost magnetic attraction to events which offer predictable policing - such as a Pegida March through a city centre, but are incapable of defending people from the actual threat of terror we all feel.
Whilst we sit waiting for our next 7/7, the Metropolitan Police were arresting a man for a tweet, accidentally charging him to appear in court, before sheepishly letting him go.

This is just one example of her staggering ignorance of how the terror threat is being combated and is very insulting to the police.
Naomi....Don't be so supercillious....you asked me a question and I gave you my answer. I'm not sure I can add anything more.

Mush ( 13:27)...double standards ? About exactly ?

I don't make a habit of reading what this self-important D list celebrity has to say, unless someone quotes her on AB. I am much more interested if she condemns the original terrorist outrages, but I am guessing that there is not enough controversy in that for her.

Mikey, //Naomi....Don't be so supercillious....you asked me a question and I gave you my answer. I'm not sure I can add anything more. //

I'm not being supercilious - and you didn't give me an answer. Seems you really can't add anything more. Can't think why. ;o)
"produce evidence that shows that I do not supports Britain !
"

you are a republican and you want to see the country destroyed by letting the eussr take it over...how much more proof do you want ?....

21 to 33 of 33rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Katie Hopkins Has Got It About Right Once Again.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.