Quizzes & Puzzles64 mins ago
Police mergers
So why do I get the impression that whatever the result of the consultation process, the government will go ahead anyway?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by SaxyJag. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Cleveland Police are really against it. To me it is diverting from the fact that the government is losing the war on crime and it is not confronting the real facts with real policies.
Merging police forces and other mediocre policies mean damn all to the public. It is when we can dismantle the fortresses we've had to make our homes into,when children can play safely in the street,when pensioners can release themselves from the homes they have been imprisoned in...in fact when all of us feel safe,then we can start believing the politicians in their fight against crime.
Ta Ta
Marky B
The realreason for these mergers is to bring our police forces in line with the EU regions. Has no-one else really noticed that the four Welsh forces are being merged as are the five East Midlands forces and other forces throughout England.
The official excuse is that they will be more efficient in fighting terrorism and cross-border crime, but these are things that don't really affect most of us in our everyday lives. Most people are more concerned with violent crimes, robbery, car theft and vandalism. The merged forces will be far less effective in fighting these crimes because they will be more centrally based.
Having said that though - I am not sure that a questionnaire / referendum is the best way to go forward. I don't know what the population is of Leicestershire is - but for arguments sake lets say 500,000 adults. Of those, how many people do you think actually understand the whole problem?
To me its a bit like the Euro - most people have an opinion on it (usually swayed by what paper they read) but the majority of people (including me) do not understand the full ramifications of joining. So should there be a consultation?
Like Hammar-head says it is all to do with the regionalization that the EU wants and was proposed by John Prescott which was rejected in the two referendums last year.
Lots of services etc are being merged, there are unelected regional councils and in time these regions will be proposed again and when people object they will be told it's already been done nothing is going to alter therefore your objections will be invalid.
Cheshire wanted to link with Shropshire or Staffordshire as they are similar forces instead they have to merge with Liverpool as thats the same region the other two aren't.
well i agree with you both.
1. We might get consulted but this government will not listen.
2. This merging actually goes against what the blair government have been trying to do by introducing safer neighbourhood teams. On the one hand they are putting more police on the streets and pouring money into the service and making the police more relevant/local. Merging forces to create super forces will divert a huge amount of money from the front line and make policing less local.
3. Much of the government's justification for this is the need for police forces to be bigger so more able to fight crime in the "modern" era. What they mean is more emphasis on counter terrorism and serious and organised crime. of course this is important to fight these priorities but this should not be the focus of mainstream police.
The government have set up the serious and organised crime agency and enhanced the ability of MI5 so there is no need to cover the same areas twice.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.