“The only alternative to bail is a remand in custody, that is VERY rare in crimes other than murder, manslaughter and GBH with intent.”
Eddie, Eddie, I thought you knew about these things!
Magistrates and judges remand people in custody every day of the week for far less serious crimes than the ones you mention. The 1976 Bail Act governs what happens and it says, basically that everybody has the right to bail unless it can be shown that there is genuine reason to believe that they might:
(a) Abscond (i.e. fail to turn up for their next appearance)
(b) Commit further offences
(c) Interfere with the course of justice (in particular, witnesses)
Bail with conditions may be granted to allay those fears (e.g. a condition to stay away from a particular person and/or location if the problem is (c)). But if no conditions satisfy the court that the risk is sufficiently reduced then a remand in custody is appropriate. In particular remands in custody are frequently used for cases of assault committed as Domestic Violence, where it is feared that the accused, if released, may “persuade” the victim to “change her mind”.
There is insufficient detail to say why the court was satisfied that these people should be granted bail. The fact that they may have no UK address (and we don’t know if that is the case) is not, by itself, a reason to refuse bail.