Christmas4 mins ago
Your Verdict On Osborne As Chancellor.
His lease on No.11 is up. How did he do?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I am just glad he is gone....sacked according to the BBC News, not "resigned". The fact that isn't being shuffled somewhere else speaks volumes. Nothing for IDS either I see !
I am beginning to enjoy this. If I thought that both Osborne and IDS were going to be thrown out, I might have voted for BREXIT after all.
Any news of that other twit Jeremy Hunt ?
I am beginning to enjoy this. If I thought that both Osborne and IDS were going to be thrown out, I might have voted for BREXIT after all.
Any news of that other twit Jeremy Hunt ?
eek what has happened
Gromit thread is headlines as Mikey's
anyway - those who leave under a cloud, tend to be treated lightly by history and those who leave in a hail of plaudits - think Bliar.... Wilson
Perhaps those in a positiion to control their image ( Broon and Osborne clearly didnt ) go for the Big One whilst they can ....
Gromit thread is headlines as Mikey's
anyway - those who leave under a cloud, tend to be treated lightly by history and those who leave in a hail of plaudits - think Bliar.... Wilson
Perhaps those in a positiion to control their image ( Broon and Osborne clearly didnt ) go for the Big One whilst they can ....
It is the Guardian, but this is a savage critique of Osborne.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ comment isfree/ 2016/ju l/15/ge orge-os borne-a usterit y-choke d-recov ery-bre xit-leg acy-ref erendum -revolt
https:/
@gromit
I have already joined some dots thus:-
- Political parties "buying votes", via election promises
- Repeated gubmint borrowing, to follow through on said promises
- More borrowing to pay for the (unforseen?) consequences of policy dogma (eg harm to health, from poverty and swelling welfare bills, consequent to industry closures)
- Housing ponzi runs out of new entrants, causing banking crash
- Yet more borrowing, to bail out the failed banks
- Austerity measures, to make good the loan repayments
- Public becomes increasingly conscious of where their tax money actually goes
- Brexit, in effort to "stem the haemorrhage* of funds to the EU"
So, do I still need to read this Guardian article?
* Of barely 1% of national spend.
I have already joined some dots thus:-
- Political parties "buying votes", via election promises
- Repeated gubmint borrowing, to follow through on said promises
- More borrowing to pay for the (unforseen?) consequences of policy dogma (eg harm to health, from poverty and swelling welfare bills, consequent to industry closures)
- Housing ponzi runs out of new entrants, causing banking crash
- Yet more borrowing, to bail out the failed banks
- Austerity measures, to make good the loan repayments
- Public becomes increasingly conscious of where their tax money actually goes
- Brexit, in effort to "stem the haemorrhage* of funds to the EU"
So, do I still need to read this Guardian article?
* Of barely 1% of national spend.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.