Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I posted about an almost identical case some weeks ago. Another sad demonstration of how gullible our judiciary are. I just don't think crusty old judges have a clue in this area.
// I just don't think crusty old judges have a clue in this area.// 3T

no I think it is more likely that 3T doesnt have a clue how the criminal law system works

the crown has to show something beyond reasonable doubt ( so one is sure...) Here it is a civil case decided on balance of probability and quite properly should NOT be published as a jury has to be sure and not just reasonably certain

see Gray v Barr 1967
I mourn the avoidable death of a child. Yes no doubt procedure was followed correctly must make you proud PP.
Mushroom,
Not sure if you are posting about the case, which was discussed at lengh on AB at the time, or the reporting restrictions that prevent facts from the case being made public.

The restrictions were said to be to prevent the identity of the sibling to Ellie being identified. But it had the effect of letting some of the people responsible for the mistake being able to hide.

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Lesons Will Be Learned, Of Course...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.