Can Anyone Explain

[Samuraisan]

Can anyone explain to me what exactly happened regarding Hillary Clinton's email scandal? I mean the last one a couple of years ago. What did she do wrong ?

[Old_Geezer]

As I understand it, she had a personal e-mail server, which was not allowed, and may or may not have mixed up confidential stuff from her job with her personal correspondence when using it.

[mikey4444]

She is supposed to have allowed classified emails to pass through her private email server. She was fund guilty of being careless, but nothing worse.

She has apologised for this on countless occasions, but now that she is in the lead,, and Trump is struggling, the FBI has announced some new allegations, which it is refusing to name.

[Samuraisan]

Oh right. Thanks guys. So probably no worse than they all do. The hype all sounded more serious.

[trt]

## I mean the last one a couple of years ago. What did she do wrong ? ##

Maybe, threatening Monica Lewinsky!!!!

[mikey4444]

Samuraisan....it could be serious for Hilary. At this stage in the proceedings, I think she can ride the storm, but there is now an increased chance that Trump could get into the White House by default.

[Togo]

No mikey she was routing confidential emails, some security sensitive, through a private server. She is accused of doing so to enable herself to link them to "private business dealings" for herself and Bill. Shades of Blair and the way that he has conducted himself.

[mikey4444]

Togo...but all that was investigated years ago. What is happening now smacks of foul play.

[mikey4444]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37806792

[Togo]

The FBI are looking through deleted emails and tracking down recipients and other interested parties old in boxes mikey.

[Togo]

We aren't talking local plod here, the FBI. I would not doubt that the CIA and tax ferrets are in there somewhere as well.

[Togo]

Ahh Anthony Weiner disgraced congressman at "skiddiesgate", who was promptly appointed as a top adviser to the firm that handles Hilary's PR. Just like our slimy lot over here the creeps think that they are fireproof. But Nigel and Donald have taught them that the are far from it, despite them having willing followers in their millions who are happy to turn a blind eye.

[Prudie]

Being careless is carp. many of us have different email accounts and different servers, we all know which one we're on and what we should or shouldn't be sending on it. I'm well aware I'm being naughty when I'm using official work e-mail for personal stuff.

[Peter Pedant]

she did work emails on her home server
really bad as it was state department ( = foreign office ) business
.

Your employer will have rules about doing work work on hotmail
we used an external circuit despite instructions again - shhh! sercretly as we knew he was reading our emails event tho a lot was union business ....

The emails came up in 'other business' when they were searching a senators email concerning sexualised email to a minor ( oops ! ) whilst he was married to a Hillary adherent

and no one has said: are these emails admissible considering they were turned up investigating kiddie stuff and Hillary we know has nothing to do with that .

But they havent - from which I conclude they are .....altho a warrant in england has to specify what info you are looking for in a computer.