Cherie Blair fears for her children.

[anotheoldgit]

Cherie Blair admitted yesterday that she fears for the safety of her children when they go out on the streets.

This is rich coming from a woman who's husband entered this country into an illegal war in Iraq, and sent our troops into a war we cannot win in Afghanistan.

Does she not think that hundreds of other mothers fear for their children who are out in these war zones, risking their lives, when there was no need for them to do so?

Before anyone says that they joined the forces voluntary, and should be expected to take this risk, that is quite correct, but only if the risk is necessary and worthwhile, and In both these cases it was not.

[R1Geezer]

As you say rich comming from the WWW bearing in mind she's the money grubbing lawyer in chief who'll be representing the lowlives she refers to in some sort of ooman rights claim.

[Abdulmajid]

My first thought when I started reading this question was not so much the war in Iraq/Afghan but the way she has taking power away from the Police and Schools with her foul take on human rights and stop and search powers etc.

Thus making many areas of London a "safe" zone for knife weilding coloured teenagers.

"Ooooooooooooh we can't stop them, it's racist"

The woman makes me sick. I hope she dies a foul and horrible death with the faces of ALL the victims she has caused. Be that in terrorist situations where she has represented them, gun and knife victims which she sees as being racist when we stop coloured oiks and, as you say, our baby soldiers who are dying due to her husbands (and now podgy=faced Brown) serious underfunding of decent ballistic vests and armoured carriers.

CHERIE BLAIR, DIE YOU BIIIIATCH.

[Davethedog]

So why don't the mothers get thier kids out.

They know what the risk is.

I take it then that you are A) in favour of persecution and genocide. B) In favour of appeasement to a regime that harboured people that would have bombed your country without mercy.

What is necessary and worthwhile is a matter of perspective.

There can never be an answer and I question the motives, but twee statements are an insult to those who risk their lives.

[BertiWooster]

So , shouldn't she fear for her children when they go out on the streets - like any other mother - because of who is her husband ?

Is the war in afghanistan or Iraq , responsible for assaults/muggings/ stabbings , out there on the streets of GB ?

[sp1214]

And to add insult to injury most of those soldiers being killed are reservists. They probably served their normal Army service before Blair took power and could not have forseen these stupid wars. It is pointless for brave soldiers like these to complain of their human rights being violated.

[kev1]

If she fears for her childrens safety living in a �10 million house she should try 12 months living in Liverpool or Leeds or Newcastle or any of the other cities that her moron of a husband has done nothing to help

[keyplus90]

Davethedog-
B) In favour of appeasement to a regime that harboured people that would have bombed your country without mercy.

It is better to attack on the assumption that the others would have attacked you. And what does your perception depends on that these people might have attacked.

In other words we have already done what we suspect others will do.

[Lunol]

"Does she not think that hundreds of other mothers fear for their children who are out in these war zones, risking their lives, when there was no need for them to do so? "

Let us not forget the thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people including children, women, the elderly and the sick ( In hospitals ) Mercilessly killed/displaced and made homeless by the bombings in a war they didn't want nor create.

^Let's not forget that "Little" aspect of the war you seem to have forgotten.