Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Are The Government Right To Scrap The Rise In Ni Contributions For The Self-Employed?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.What are election promises for, if not to break them at the first possible opportunity.
It is a useful reminder that they constantly lie to us, and we should not, for a minute, believe their promises about a glorious future under the increasingly iratic May.
When the Conservatives promised no rise in NI in the manifesto, the reason they gave was:
// This means that we can commit to no increases in VAT, Income Tax or National Insurance. Tax rises on working people would harm our economy, reduce living standards and cost jobs. //
- Conservative Manifesto 2015 Page 10
That is what the nation voted for.
It is a useful reminder that they constantly lie to us, and we should not, for a minute, believe their promises about a glorious future under the increasingly iratic May.
When the Conservatives promised no rise in NI in the manifesto, the reason they gave was:
// This means that we can commit to no increases in VAT, Income Tax or National Insurance. Tax rises on working people would harm our economy, reduce living standards and cost jobs. //
- Conservative Manifesto 2015 Page 10
That is what the nation voted for.
If the government is going to break a manifesto promise, which is immoral, it should have the courage of its convictions.
Breaking a promise, and then cowering in the face of the predictable storm of outrage, and then backtracking makes the government look immoral, and then scared, and the immoral again for backtracking.
Then again, maybe keeping its promises in the first place is a good way to avoid this kind of situation?
Breaking a promise, and then cowering in the face of the predictable storm of outrage, and then backtracking makes the government look immoral, and then scared, and the immoral again for backtracking.
Then again, maybe keeping its promises in the first place is a good way to avoid this kind of situation?
This does not bode well.
Cameron was a past master at not listening, doing the wrong thing, and then being forced into an embarrassing u-turn. It seems May is picking up, where Dave left off.
The other worrying aspect is the speed with which the Prime Minister has abandoned her Chancellor. It is inconcievable that she did not know the election pledge was being broken. So she should support her Minister and take some of the blame. But Hammond has been fed to the lions. The message is clear to Mrs May's Cabinet, Ministers and MPs - don't expect any loyalty and support from your boss. And be prepared to be abandoned if there is a public backlash.
Cameron was a past master at not listening, doing the wrong thing, and then being forced into an embarrassing u-turn. It seems May is picking up, where Dave left off.
The other worrying aspect is the speed with which the Prime Minister has abandoned her Chancellor. It is inconcievable that she did not know the election pledge was being broken. So she should support her Minister and take some of the blame. But Hammond has been fed to the lions. The message is clear to Mrs May's Cabinet, Ministers and MPs - don't expect any loyalty and support from your boss. And be prepared to be abandoned if there is a public backlash.
Just who was it that first realised that the Budget meant that the Government was in "flagrant" breach of their 2015 Manifesto promises ? Not Mrs May, or even Mr Hammond !
Well, it was the Ms Kuenssberg apparently, according to the Chancellor !
Well done the Beeb !
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/vi deo_and _audio/ headlin es/3928 4084
Well, it was the Ms Kuenssberg apparently, according to the Chancellor !
Well done the Beeb !
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.