ChatterBank1 min ago
Why Didn't They Listen To Our Nigel, Two Years Ago?
36 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If you analyse these quotes from Farage closely they don't make a lot of sense. One concerns "migrant terrorists", and seems to imply that in the two years since his words of "wisdom" there has been a spate of terror attacks by migrants, and I see no evidence for that.
Another seems to suggest that IS has succeeded in secretly importing 500,000 terrorists to Europe, and unless he has inside information, that seems a little unlikely.
A lot of people have come across the Med by boat, certainly, causing a huge humanitarian crisis, but of course all he cares about is how it makes him look. The answer to that question, if you look only a little beneath the surface, is "attention-seeking politico"
Another seems to suggest that IS has succeeded in secretly importing 500,000 terrorists to Europe, and unless he has inside information, that seems a little unlikely.
A lot of people have come across the Med by boat, certainly, causing a huge humanitarian crisis, but of course all he cares about is how it makes him look. The answer to that question, if you look only a little beneath the surface, is "attention-seeking politico"
Zacs; Stop wriggling, here's one from the EU parliament itself;
http:// www.eur oparl.e uropa.e u/sides /getDoc .do?pub Ref=-// EP//TEX T+WQ+E- 2015-01 5092+0+ DOC+XML +V0//EN &la nguage= it
http://
ichkeria, a lot of migrant rapists murderers thieves arsonists, and not to mention carrying diseases, then their is housing feeding schooling
re-education if possible of that i doubt, cultural and tribal problems.
how many for instance from sub saharan africa have work in the uk and are not on tax payer benefits inc housing medical schooling etc etc 99%, they are a drag on the economy and should have never been allowed to settle here, they add 0 to the uk, but take out of it.
re-education if possible of that i doubt, cultural and tribal problems.
how many for instance from sub saharan africa have work in the uk and are not on tax payer benefits inc housing medical schooling etc etc 99%, they are a drag on the economy and should have never been allowed to settle here, they add 0 to the uk, but take out of it.
> "a lot of migrant rapists murderers thieves arsonists, and not to mention carrying diseases,...... ,how many for instance from sub saharan africa have work in the uk and are not on tax payer benefits inc housing medical schooling etc etc 99%, they are a drag on the economy and should have never been allowed to settle here, they add 0 to the uk, but take out of it."
Do you have a link for that 99% figure please, fender?
Do you have a link for that 99% figure please, fender?
Peter pedant; //listen to our nige ?the one who said before THE referendum - £350m a week would go to the NHS and after the referendum - oops I shouldnt have said that!//
The remoaners never want to give up on this, but the fact is that the UK will be 8billion per annum better off after Brexit. If someone had put a ladder against that bus and had changed £350m. to £250m. and changed, would go to the NHS to could go to the NHS, then it would have been correct.
The remoaners never want to give up on this, but the fact is that the UK will be 8billion per annum better off after Brexit. If someone had put a ladder against that bus and had changed £350m. to £250m. and changed, would go to the NHS to could go to the NHS, then it would have been correct.
As we all know, £350M was the accurate figure we are down to pay, prior to any temporary 'rebate' which, for now, is removed from the total first. By now one would have thought even the most ardent remainer would have given up on their lie that the £350M wasn't true. Surely no one is being fooled any more ? Save perhaps themselves.
Can we forget the £350m a week cos it's cobblers.
In 2016 the UK government paid £13.1 billion to the EU budget, and EU spending on the UK was forecast to be £4.5 billion. So the UK’s ‘net contribution’ was estimated at about £8.6 billion.
https:/ /fullfa ct.org/ europe/ our-eu- members hip-fee -55-mil lion/
This is a little over £165m a week for 2016.
In 2016 the UK government paid £13.1 billion to the EU budget, and EU spending on the UK was forecast to be £4.5 billion. So the UK’s ‘net contribution’ was estimated at about £8.6 billion.
https:/
This is a little over £165m a week for 2016.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-eu-r eferend um-3611 0822
Never reasonably disputed. In fact it seems it was rounded down from £361.
Never reasonably disputed. In fact it seems it was rounded down from £361.
Indeed, the link you provide states, "£350 million is what we would pay to the EU budget, without the rebate." i.e. it is what we are down to pay barring any temporary rebate; and obviously not making ludicrous claims about getting a share allocated to UK projects means that part ought not count. So presumably case finally closed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.