Quizzes & Puzzles63 mins ago
Got The Court Forms Back And Am Not Sure About Serving The Papers
I applied to the court N316 and EX 140 for the ex tenants to provide details of their means to pay the second of the money orders I have against them.
I thought they would have been sent to them by the court but the letter says I have to serve them N39 and a copy of N316 personally and can't give them to someone else to serve or post them through the letterbox.
It also says I have to give the court a a copy and a signed affidavit EX550
Why is it so complicated? Why don't they just send them?
I thought they would have been sent to them by the court but the letter says I have to serve them N39 and a copy of N316 personally and can't give them to someone else to serve or post them through the letterbox.
It also says I have to give the court a a copy and a signed affidavit EX550
Why is it so complicated? Why don't they just send them?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by cassa333. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Just had a look about and it does have to be served either by me or a bailiff or such like.
However there are two debtors. They are married and live together. They have different ***.
My next question is can I serve them both to the first one who answers the door or do I have to serve them both individually?
Thanks
However there are two debtors. They are married and live together. They have different ***.
My next question is can I serve them both to the first one who answers the door or do I have to serve them both individually?
Thanks
because some people just say they havent received diddly squat ever
( as I said to one in court - but that is not true - you have turned up today in court!)
and there is this runaround so that when they turn up in court and say...
the judge can still go on and hear the case....
My moronic ex tenant who I took for £600 rent arrears watched it balloon to £2,000 in costs
has just gone under in the sum of £29 000. ( clearly not all my money)
( as I said to one in court - but that is not true - you have turned up today in court!)
and there is this runaround so that when they turn up in court and say...
the judge can still go on and hear the case....
My moronic ex tenant who I took for £600 rent arrears watched it balloon to £2,000 in costs
has just gone under in the sum of £29 000. ( clearly not all my money)
It is because you have to be able to stand up in court under oath and swear that you delivered the court papers to them. The tenants can not then say they did not get them.
People in that situation often say they never got the papers even if recorded delivery by the post office was used. Personal service removes all dought.
People in that situation often say they never got the papers even if recorded delivery by the post office was used. Personal service removes all dought.
Your serving the papers and the affidavit means,the ex tenants can not just claim that they did not get served with the papers, they would have to PROVE they were not served with them and that therefore you were lying under oath , which of course means proving you committed perjury. ( which of course you did not)
OK here's a suplimentary question to serving the N39 forms.
Should I just turn up on their doorstep or let them know I'm coming round to give them papers?
Last time I went to give them papers they didn't answer the door, but it wasn't essential I serve them personally. These have to be though. Is it worth prewarning them that if they refuse to cooperate I will inform the court they are being obstructive and they will have to take the consequences. (If any!!)
Should I just turn up on their doorstep or let them know I'm coming round to give them papers?
Last time I went to give them papers they didn't answer the door, but it wasn't essential I serve them personally. These have to be though. Is it worth prewarning them that if they refuse to cooperate I will inform the court they are being obstructive and they will have to take the consequences. (If any!!)
// I have been wondering what would happen if they just refused to answer the door? How could you serve the notices then?//
I got a neighbour to ring me when he came in ( 'he has not paid for three months' was persuasive)
thing is these people dont realise what a pain in the behind a CCJ is - until their credit dries up .....
I got a neighbour to ring me when he came in ( 'he has not paid for three months' was persuasive)
thing is these people dont realise what a pain in the behind a CCJ is - until their credit dries up .....
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.