Jake - for me there's just too much circumstantial 'evidence' across a whole series of incidents involving JP stretching back over the whole life of this Government. When you are in public life your actions are inevitably under the spotlight and sections of the Press will try and whip events up out of proportion by focusing unreasonably on them. And no-one is perfect, so we shouldn't be looking for perfection from a leader, in whatever capacity that person leads. But the function of a good leader is to show leadership qualities most of the time. And this man would seem to do too many questionable things that are out line with 'norms'. Some of this evidence is 'fact' (throwing punches at egg-throwing members of the public, running 2Jags in the name of Kyoto, extra-marital activities in the office) whilst some is conjecture. That (for me) means he is a liability to others that he is associated with (the Labour Government) and therefore he should be removed from his high office (which is now slightly less high than it used to be).