Yet Another Example Of A So Called 'asylum Seeker' Who Has Taken This Country For A Ride, Big Time.

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5185817/Refugee-received-benefits-returning-homeland.html

Interesting to note however that without the so called 'RAGS' we might never get to hear about them.

15 months in jail for the amount in cash that this scrounger has cost the British tax payer is disgusting.

[emmie]

At that rate it would have taken Qoomaal, who also burdens the NHS with heart and renal issues, seventeen years to repay the £38,869.97p total.

Despite arriving in this country fifteen years ago he also needed a taxpayer-funded interpreter during eight court hearings.

k

[emmie]

another kick in the teeth to people who struggle to get benefits at all, kick the bstard out once he's finished his jail time.

[Zacs-Master]

I wouldn’t have called £40k ‘big time’. The system is at fault for not having enough resources to check up on every asylum seeker. But that would cost the British tax payer a damn site more than £40k.

[emmie]

zacs
all the same its people like him i totally despise. whilst some genuine claimants struggle to get any benefits we have to shoulder this waste of space.

[Mamyalynne]

He'll probably spend more time being transported to hospital and back for treatment and dialysis than he will inside.

Glad they've got him all the same.

[Bazile]

Don't you see ?

He couldn't understand the language , which resulted in the errors he submitted in his claims

[emmie]

mamy
he probably will..

[emmie]

eight court cases, what the hell did that cost i wonder..

[Zacs-Master]

Sammie, I’m in no way condoning or supporting him. I’m merely pointing out that someone has probably done the sums to work out that it would cost an awful lot more to ‘police’ every asylum seeker than let a few get away with it.

[Zacs-Master]

Emmie not Sammie.

[anotheoldgit]

And there is more:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5185199/Laws-preventing-6-000-criminals-deported.html

[New Judge]

"The system is at fault for not having enough resources to check up on every asylum seeker. But that would cost the British tax payer a damn site more than £40k."

So by that reasoning then, Zacs, because it is too difficult or expensive to stop paying them benefits and track them down, we should allow every waif and stray who fancies a cushy life to arrive and settle here, give them a council flat and allow them to pick our pockets via the benefits system.

[Zacs-Master]

I’m not sure where to begin criticising your post NJ, but let’s have a stab:
Not every asylum seeker makes fraudulent claims. In fact I’m pretty sure it’s a very small percentage. So that means I’m not in favour of ‘allowing every waif and stray who fancies a cushy life to arrive and settle here‘.
You seem to have done the classic AB response of assuming because I say one thing, I mean another.
I thought you were better than that but you are patently capable of sinking to AOGs levels of ‘reasoning’ when you think it suits.

[anotheoldgit]

Zacs-Master

Perhaps it is because we don't sink to your level that obviously seems to upset you so much?

[Zacs-Master]

AOG, you really do seem to have cornered the market in illogically childish and unfounded statements on here.

[hereIam]

Good post at 13:49 NJ ..

[scooping]

And we're paying a fortune to look after him in nick. Should be bunged out of the country. The Left bleat endlessly about lack of money for public services so, for once, maybe they'd like to save the taxpayer some money and throw these mickey-taking scrotes OUT.

[New Judge]

“You seem to have done the classic AB response of assuming because I say one thing, I mean another.”

I’ve done no such thing, Zacs.

“Not every asylum seeker makes fraudulent claims.”

Indeed not and I never suggested they do. But many do.

It is a fair assumption to make that, when you mention the cost of policing these fraudulent claims, you accept that a level of fraud is acceptable to defer the costs of that policing. You compared the cost to the taxpayer this particular gentleman thrust on the taxpayer by his lies and deception saying that effective policing would probably cost more. I don’t see any conclusion to reach other than that we should accept the occasional chancer such as Mr Qoomaal in our midst as a fair price to pay to save us the cost of catching people such as him. Even if somebody has done the sums and correctly determined that you are right, it makes in none the less acceptable.