Worboys Fiasco......

[ToraToraTora]

Nick Hardiwick, Parole board Chairman, is on the box right now talking about the parole board's decision, one of the things he said was that they are not allowed by law to explain their decision. WHAT? Jesus on a bicycle, they've just let a low life out onto the streets without telling all his victims and we are not even allowed to know their reasoning? What possible reason could there be for this? Just going out will check in later.

[mushroom25]

awesome bit of shoulder-slopery by keir starmer....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-42574651

[Bazile]

Well if that is true then you can hardly blame him .

You can argue that what is needed is a change in the law

[youngmafbog]

Bit of a mess all round this case.

But I would not hold your breath for anything to be done, the liberal left love to put the criminals 'rights' above those of the victims.

[bednobs]

are you saying the current govt are liberal left? Who'da thunk it

[emmie]

I posted on this morning, lots of interesting comments...

[emmie]

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1587908.html

[ToraToraTora]

yes emmie but this is different discussion.

[emmie]

I know, but there's lots of interest in this case, i for one would put a noose round his neck, but that isn't possible.

[Zacs-Master]

I would imagine they're not allowed to explain their reasons to prevent the more manipulative criminals from 'working the system'.

[Peter Pedant]

oh, free-tee I was thinking of you...

//WHAT? Jesus on a bicycle, they've just let a low life out onto the streets //

yeah foo dat what dat - whadda they fink den...... blah blah blah the rubbish is endless

there is a law that says the decisions of the parole board are private - a bit like the jury room.

easy one....[ sum fings are private and sum uvver fings are public]

3T: yeah but no but what dat - naaah - foo dat ! etc etc for 12 lines

[Peter Pedant]

// yes emmie but this is different discussion//

no emmie - it isnt - the same old same old from the usual suspects again

hey emmie recollect the different Brexit discussions we would have EVERY day - bring back the good old days !

[ToraToraTora]

ZM "I would imagine they're not allowed to explain their reasons to prevent the more manipulative criminals from 'working the system'. " - well that's working! PMSL

[Zacs-Master]

Why have you wet yourself again? Your emotions seem to be ruling your bladder now, as well as your watch.

[Togo]

//one of the things he said was that they are not allowed by law to explain their decision.//

I'm sure they find that very handy. They should BY LAW have to explain their reasoning. Reasoning......Sheesh talk about oxymoron.

[murraymints]

reported that some of the women that came forward but whose cases were not used to prosecute are pursuing fresh separate charges