News1 min ago
And They Wonder Why Sympathy Was Waining
Not even in the country and they get special status, the money could be better spent on genuine victims of the fire.
https:/ /www.th etimes. co.uk/a rticle/ family- in-1m-f raud-in quiry-g et-spec ial-gre nfell-t ower-st atus-kv 9scxtc9
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Those who don't subscribe to The Times website won't be able to read most of that report. However much it has been copied by the Australian press:
https:/ /www.th eaustra lian.co m.au/ne ws/worl d/16m-c ompo-fo r-exten ded-gre nfell-t ower-fa mily/ne ws-stor y/c98f8 745a7a9 00333db 9be4d9f 2ca8b1
or people can refer to the original version, in the Daily Wail:
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-55 87721/A -family -15-Afg hans-cl aim-sha red-thr ee-bedr oom-Gre nfell-f lat.htm l
https:/
or people can refer to the original version, in the Daily Wail:
http://
The Grenfell tragedy has generated a lot of fraud.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-londo n-43673 903
http://
It's good to see that fraud cases like this are being actively pursued as I thought they might get overlooked for reasons of political expediency and 'community relations'. The case of the 15 people who were put up in temporary accommodation when only 4 were registered as tenants is concerning- okay theere may be sentences for fraud but maybe more questions should have been asked at a much earlier stage- certainly before all 15 were rehoused and perhaps closer checks should have been made over several years on whether tenancy rules are being followed in some of these properties. I hope they also follow up on any past housing benefit claims.
It's a shame that in any tragedy there are always people who see an opportunity to take advantage- and in the case of Grenfell it seems to have been on a wide scale.
It's a shame that in any tragedy there are always people who see an opportunity to take advantage- and in the case of Grenfell it seems to have been on a wide scale.
I also agree with ummmm to some extent. The term special status might give the impression to some of meaning only a select small number of people but as the Mail says "The list of core participants, comprising 504 bereaved relatives, survivors, and local residents, was published on March 20. Masi Naqshbandi’s name is on it, along with his parents, three brothers and sister."
Hopefully the fraud trials will take up much of their time though and leave them unavailable to use the special status
Hopefully the fraud trials will take up much of their time though and leave them unavailable to use the special status
They're brown, one has a limp, another completely misunderstood your Eengleesh way of not behaving corruptly in every waking moment.
There will be no meaningful outcome to enquiries. Any pressure to look properly will be shouted down as racism by a celebrity lawyer, backed by nodding youths muttering 'yeah bro' and other obscure legalese as he trots out the usual guff for the cameras.
There will be no meaningful outcome to enquiries. Any pressure to look properly will be shouted down as racism by a celebrity lawyer, backed by nodding youths muttering 'yeah bro' and other obscure legalese as he trots out the usual guff for the cameras.
Do you not have any ideas at all AOG?
Some factors- it seemed an easy opportunity since it was unlikely anyone would ever identify all the bodies or could prove someone wasn't involved; fraud/rule breaking was already going on in terms of subletting and breaches of tenancy agreements so was ingrained in the way some of these people think; they knew the public were generally sympathetic and would give generously to anyone with a tragic story; and insurance fraud or claims for lost property would be very difficult to disprove as they'd have a perfect excuse for having no receipts available.
Any more?
Some factors- it seemed an easy opportunity since it was unlikely anyone would ever identify all the bodies or could prove someone wasn't involved; fraud/rule breaking was already going on in terms of subletting and breaches of tenancy agreements so was ingrained in the way some of these people think; they knew the public were generally sympathetic and would give generously to anyone with a tragic story; and insurance fraud or claims for lost property would be very difficult to disprove as they'd have a perfect excuse for having no receipts available.
Any more?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.