Switzerland 5 Belgium 2. I Smell A Rat

[piggynose]

Am i being too cynical?

[Hopkirk]

Yes

[Duncer]

Agreed.

[piggynose]

Maybe a betting scam

[Ken4155]

??????? Belgium had 15 attempts on goal, 6 of which brought saves from the keeper, the other 2 on target. How does that equate to a conspiracy theory? Or did you just look at the scoreline, piggy?

[Mamyalynne]

Backed the wrong team Piggynose?


Just a tip for future, try not to put scores in titles or the main body of your opening post that can be seen when scrolling a topic.

Put the result in as a first reply. :-)

[piggynose]

Must remember to watch the highlights. Just seemed very convenient to lose by 5.2. Esp as it was well documented that the switz needed to win by 2 clear goals.

[piggynose]

Er mamy, i think you missed the point. The result was a type of headline.

[Mamyalynne]

I didn't miss the point - as it's not an important game to many I'll shut up.

[piggynose]

Mamy you def have missed the point.
Surely when a team in any sport loses, esp by such a big margin people start to ask questions. Maybe this is an exception.

[dannyk13]

Piggynose, did you smell a rat when England lost 6-0 to Hungary?

[dannyk13]

Sorry make that score 7-1.

[straydog]

Piggynose I think Mamy was trying to say that if anyone had not watched it yet, your headline was a bit of a “spoiler”

[Ken4155]

Piggy, you must have asked loads of questions down the years if you think a 5-2 result is sus.

[piggynose]

Lastly i watched the highlights. Belgium played like it was a training session. Have they already qualified?