Donate SIGN UP

Answers

41 to 42 of 42rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ladybirder. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
OG // We hold [referendums] on rare occasions and won't be wasting public money on an issue that we've already made our decision on. //

You mean shouldn't, not won't. There'll probably be another one (instigated by a pro-'people's vote' person that replaces Mrs May) containing 3 options..

1 - Accept the negotiated deal
2 - Leave with no deal
3 - Remain

The purpose of options 1 and 2 being to split the leave vote thus ensuring a remain victory.

Having said that, nothing I've predicted over the last 5 years has been right, so no-one should take much notice of this. :-)
Question Author
Even I would get off my sofa and protest about that Ludwig, both another referendum and certainly the three options which would undoubtedly mean 3) wins. Not very clever as its purpose would be blindingly obvious.

41 to 42 of 42rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Do You Disagree With William Hague's Eight Reasons Why We Should Support

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.