//Togo, would you have the patience and wherewithal to evaluate your own sources objectively, and those that disagree with you likewise?//
Would I be paid handsomely, like all the other "objective" evaluators of raw data? Perhaps I would be offered a nice sinecure if I could be relied upon to come to the "right" conclusion even. Meanwhile I am happy to take the stance whereby I do my best to keep up to speed with all aspects of the issues that may affect us. Starting from a standpoint of healthy scepticism but willing to be convinced by properly conducted study. I also reserve the right to be scathingly dubious of any such "data" that is proven to be inaccurate to the point of being gerrymandered in order to prove a lie, and then further used to empower politicians and quangos to commit wholesale fraud. To say nothing of it being further utilised to drive a quasi religious like cult of virtue signalling. What started as a question regarding the dubious CO2 emissions theory revealed much worse, even as far as accusations of doubting the Apollo programme to condoning deforestation. It in fact revealed which of us are the true swivel eyed cultists. As you may have gathered I do indeed have the patience. I may even have the wherewithal, as long as it does not need unicorn tears or fairy sweat to sustain it.