Motion F: Public Vote To Prevent No Deal

[mushroom25]

one of the options to be voted on - assuming it gets picked.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47767627
//public to vote on the future of Brexit, but in this case it would only happen if the UK was otherwise going to leave the EU without a deal.//

can anyone explain this to me? a vote to be triggered if "no deal" likely - but any such vote would take 6 months to set up (even assuming parliament could agree on the wording of the question), requiring a 6m exit delay. wouldn't any such exit delay be better exercised by finding a deal, if that's indeed what parliament wants?

[ichkeria]

If by April 10 we have decided to put the deal or whatever to a referendum, the EU would agree to that and we’d then have a long extension.
With Euro elections, although I heard tell of a loophole there that might get round the need to hold those but I can’t remember what it was exactly.

[ToraToraTora]

at the moment there are only 2 options, no deal or no brexit. Both are better than May's non deal.

[Old_Geezer]

Voting for it in a referendum has yet to achieve it. Why would voting against it kill it ?
Clearly parliament has no respect for public votes; only their own.

[ichkeria]

Because that would be an easy one to do.
Without wishing to go round the whole darned thing again ...

[Old_Geezer]

Achieving it is easy too. One just has to go. And doesn't mean going back on the referendum result as killing it would.

[ichkeria]

Motion F bites the dust, not surprisingly, but the SNP one rides.
So it’s C Customs Union,
D Common market 2.0 which labour look like they now want to support.
E Confirmatory referendum on “whatever”
G No Deal or Revoke vote