Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Well This Could Be Interesting, Let's Hope The Judge Isn't A Remainer.
11 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Khandro posted a video about the case, albeit as just one post in some other thread. My first impression is that the legal case simply isn't there, as it point-blank ignores various aspects of the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 regarding Exit Day.
Still, by all means let him bring the case and test the argument in court.
Still, by all means let him bring the case and test the argument in court.
//Let's see what Robin Tilbrook and the English Democrats have up their sleeves for Monday. Judicial Review proceedings?
https:/ /twitte r.com/R obinTil brook
08:16 Thu 28th Mar 2019//
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/New s/Quest ion1651 740-2.h tml
https:/
08:16 Thu 28th Mar 2019//
https:/
Yes you did make those arguments, Jim. I read the passages of the Bill as you mentioned but I did not think they held much water. It's my view that the PM's handshake with the EU leaders (to extend the A50 period) was "ultra vires" in that she did not, at that time, have the authority to make such an agreement. She retrospectively sought Parliament's agreement by means of the Statutory Instrument. I imagine it will be that which weighs more heavily on M'Learned Friends' decision. It's a bit like retrospective planning permission - very rarely do courts order buildings or extensions to be torn down.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.