Death Of Three Young Ladies Backpacking...
News6 mins ago
Who’D Be A British Pm Or Even A Potus
Trouble continues on both sides of the Atlantic with impeachment and ( alleged ) wrong doings
https:/
I feel sorry for BJ with the arrows being fired at him
https:/
I feel sorry for BJ with the arrows being fired at him
Answers
(Speaking the truth) or trying to do right for the masses in all aspects of life can be a dangerous path, anyone prepared to walk that path have my vote and support. There's very few, over the years in parliament that would ever consider such a path. support him or not ( Boris) who else have you got to stand any chance of going forward. The ones that normally shout...
11:19 Sat 28th Sep 2019
(Speaking the truth) or trying to do right for the masses in all aspects of life can be a dangerous path, anyone prepared to walk that path have my vote and support. There's very few, over the years in parliament that would ever consider such a path. support him or not ( Boris) who else have you got to stand any chance of going forward. The ones that normally shout the loudest ( and we've seen plenty of that) have the least to offer, and the most to hide.
///Boris Johnson is a millionaire old Etonian Tory PM.
Donald Trump is an even wealthier business man in the most powerful political office in the world.
If anyone is “the establishment” they are. //
I don't think you quite understand, Ikky. The "established" Establishment has an agenda which does not quite fit in to the vast majority of the electorate's wishes. It keeps them (the Establishment) enriched and comfortable and it keeps the plebs in their place. Both Mr Trump and Mr Johnson are threatening that cosy arrangement. Simply being rich does not make you a member of the Establishment (who would suggest that the likes of Lewis Hamilton, Alan Sugar, many multi-millionaire footballers or Tim Martin - Chairman of Wetherspoons - are members). No, you have to be "on message" and subscribe to the agreed agenda to be let in. Mr Johnson is trying - against overwhelming odds - to implement the result of the agenda which the electorate who bothered to vote in it (and those who didn't) were told would be the case. It unsettles the Establishment because they have vowed, since June 2016, to thwart it because it's not what they want. They are used to getting their own way and are finding it a struggle to come to terms with something over which they do not have absolute control. That's why Mr Johnson is not a member of "The Establishment".
Donald Trump is an even wealthier business man in the most powerful political office in the world.
If anyone is “the establishment” they are. //
I don't think you quite understand, Ikky. The "established" Establishment has an agenda which does not quite fit in to the vast majority of the electorate's wishes. It keeps them (the Establishment) enriched and comfortable and it keeps the plebs in their place. Both Mr Trump and Mr Johnson are threatening that cosy arrangement. Simply being rich does not make you a member of the Establishment (who would suggest that the likes of Lewis Hamilton, Alan Sugar, many multi-millionaire footballers or Tim Martin - Chairman of Wetherspoons - are members). No, you have to be "on message" and subscribe to the agreed agenda to be let in. Mr Johnson is trying - against overwhelming odds - to implement the result of the agenda which the electorate who bothered to vote in it (and those who didn't) were told would be the case. It unsettles the Establishment because they have vowed, since June 2016, to thwart it because it's not what they want. They are used to getting their own way and are finding it a struggle to come to terms with something over which they do not have absolute control. That's why Mr Johnson is not a member of "The Establishment".
Ha ha well it depends on your definition of “establishment”
Whether it’s David Icke’s lizards, Donald Trump’s “deep state”, Owen Jones’s mythical “establishment” as ranged against in his ill judged book, the “liberal elite”, or even the sinister beings who delete posts on AB, it usually amounts to anyone you can’t quite put your finger on who stops you doing “stuff”.
The people trying to stop Johnson, Trump and indeed day one else on poser doing certain stuff appear agents of the law crucially not acting unilaterally but st the behest of members of public or in the case of Trump humble employees of the national security agencies.
Whether it’s David Icke’s lizards, Donald Trump’s “deep state”, Owen Jones’s mythical “establishment” as ranged against in his ill judged book, the “liberal elite”, or even the sinister beings who delete posts on AB, it usually amounts to anyone you can’t quite put your finger on who stops you doing “stuff”.
The people trying to stop Johnson, Trump and indeed day one else on poser doing certain stuff appear agents of the law crucially not acting unilaterally but st the behest of members of public or in the case of Trump humble employees of the national security agencies.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.