Quizzes & Puzzles34 mins ago
True, Or Claptrap?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Underlying what this man says is what has been called, "asymetrical multiculturalism" (marvelous phrase!), in which minorities, like him, encourage other minorities to celebrate their inheritance & the white indigenous community is instructed to celebrate this diversity & eschew their own traditions.
Some people believe that you can't hold nativity plays anymore; you can't fly the flag of St George anymore; you can't even speak about these things anymore or you'll be called a racist.
Now whities, all together, lets sing, Kumbaya :0)
Some people believe that you can't hold nativity plays anymore; you can't fly the flag of St George anymore; you can't even speak about these things anymore or you'll be called a racist.
Now whities, all together, lets sing, Kumbaya :0)
The term "diversity" amuses me.
A few days ago I commented on a small area of East London. It was described as one of the "most diverse areas in London". Less than 10% of the population identified as "White British" whilst more than 70% described themselves as "Asian".
So, imagine an area where less than 10% of the population was not white and more than 70% described themselves as English. Would it be considered "diverse"? No, it would be seen as either predominantly white or more probably "hideously" white.
A predominantly non-white area is considered "diverse" even when the vast majority of the people there are of one ethnic origin. The one where the vast majority are white is not diverse. Such a mix is undesirable and must be diluted by any means possible.
A few days ago I commented on a small area of East London. It was described as one of the "most diverse areas in London". Less than 10% of the population identified as "White British" whilst more than 70% described themselves as "Asian".
So, imagine an area where less than 10% of the population was not white and more than 70% described themselves as English. Would it be considered "diverse"? No, it would be seen as either predominantly white or more probably "hideously" white.
A predominantly non-white area is considered "diverse" even when the vast majority of the people there are of one ethnic origin. The one where the vast majority are white is not diverse. Such a mix is undesirable and must be diluted by any means possible.
As a kid I remember virtually everybody in the cinema standing for the National Anthem, to not do so was considered unpatriotic.
Pride in our nation, flag, etc embodied in the Queen.
We were in effect, proud and therefore Nationalists, but these same beliefs today are considered racist.
And it all began with Windrush, and Enoch was a prophet.
Pride in our nation, flag, etc embodied in the Queen.
We were in effect, proud and therefore Nationalists, but these same beliefs today are considered racist.
And it all began with Windrush, and Enoch was a prophet.