News2 mins ago
This Lockdown Hasn't Worked, Has It?
32 Answers
As soon as the lockdown came in, the death rate shot up. Hundreds have been dying every day since, and still are. We're just going to have to live with it until they find a cure, like some countries live with Ebola. Ask the families of the 40,000+ what they think of the lockdown. What good did it do for them?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by 10ClarionSt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// face masks... only make everyone feel better about being with others. //
Yippee. There is a result.
Read this earlier...
// There’s no credible evidence that wearing a mask is harmful, so at worse it’s harmless. If there’s like a 1-in-10 chance that masks are somewhat helpful — and the growing amount of research suggests that both 1-in-10 and “somewhat helpful” are both understatements — isn’t it worth the tiny bit of effort to wear one and help keep our neighbors safe from potential forking death? Just in case? //
Yippee. There is a result.
Read this earlier...
// There’s no credible evidence that wearing a mask is harmful, so at worse it’s harmless. If there’s like a 1-in-10 chance that masks are somewhat helpful — and the growing amount of research suggests that both 1-in-10 and “somewhat helpful” are both understatements — isn’t it worth the tiny bit of effort to wear one and help keep our neighbors safe from potential forking death? Just in case? //
Thanks for the replies folks. All speculation. Might have, would have , could have etc. 'It's certain that death rates would have risen without lockdown'. How does anyone know that?
Mushroom mentioned a friend in ITU. I have a friend in ITU at St. Thomas' in London. He didn't treat Johnson, but was in that unit when his colleagues did. He has to change his facemask every 20 minutes because after that time, they are ineffective. Those are his words, not mine. It would appear that facemasks only serve a theraputic purpose, unless they're changed every 20 minutes. And are worn by attention seekers, of course.
The vast majority of people who have sadly died from CV-19 (95% according to PHE) either had one, or a combination of, heart disease, Type 1 diabetes or dementia.
If you are under 50 years old, you have more chance of being struck by a meteorite, than dying of CV-19.
The chances increase slightly as age increases.
I had to laugh yesterday when the daily figure for deaths was given at 36. Wrong words really. Not laugh, but see the irony of it. See how I tempt fate? But I have a reason for that low figure, straight out of the Matt Hancock Book of Press Conference Excuses.
The reason the figure was so low is because Doris from admin was given the weekend off, so the total figures haven't been submitted yet.
But the govt doesn't care about the economy, does it? We keep hearing that things will be difficult. There will be problems. But stuff it, we'll carry on anyway. Yer know, ruining the country.
The time will come when the govt has to make the decision that we are going to have to live with CV-19. Unless of course they want things to get even more difficult and problematical.
Mushroom mentioned a friend in ITU. I have a friend in ITU at St. Thomas' in London. He didn't treat Johnson, but was in that unit when his colleagues did. He has to change his facemask every 20 minutes because after that time, they are ineffective. Those are his words, not mine. It would appear that facemasks only serve a theraputic purpose, unless they're changed every 20 minutes. And are worn by attention seekers, of course.
The vast majority of people who have sadly died from CV-19 (95% according to PHE) either had one, or a combination of, heart disease, Type 1 diabetes or dementia.
If you are under 50 years old, you have more chance of being struck by a meteorite, than dying of CV-19.
The chances increase slightly as age increases.
I had to laugh yesterday when the daily figure for deaths was given at 36. Wrong words really. Not laugh, but see the irony of it. See how I tempt fate? But I have a reason for that low figure, straight out of the Matt Hancock Book of Press Conference Excuses.
The reason the figure was so low is because Doris from admin was given the weekend off, so the total figures haven't been submitted yet.
But the govt doesn't care about the economy, does it? We keep hearing that things will be difficult. There will be problems. But stuff it, we'll carry on anyway. Yer know, ruining the country.
The time will come when the govt has to make the decision that we are going to have to live with CV-19. Unless of course they want things to get even more difficult and problematical.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.