Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Delighted If That’s The Right Word ?
29 Answers
My daughter who works in a busy dental practice as a clinical manager, ordered 25 antibody tests for staff, hers came back positive so it seems she’s definitely had Covid 19 in March and now she has the antibodies
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.hi bobbz and v - word
I do get the times on paper and read the very article you refer to
I was gonna email Dr Porter and say - if ya dont know what a PPV value(*) is DON'T write on the subject!
I decided to read Sophocles Antigone on the grounds that it was more worth while =I mean have you read the drongo-crip on AB this week - BUT
the nub of Dr Porter;s article for us proles was
1) different to throat scrapes and the test for virus
2) you cant dial one up
3) but they can be ordered for health workers
4) not as useful as you think ( I wondered about that)
5) about 4% are wrong - that appears to be the false pos rate
5a (which leads me to the PPV - naughty boy - the thing you wanna know is - if it is positive, have I had the disease?
This is the PPV and should be above 95%)
6) see 5 - this does not mean the PPV is 96% - the PPV depends also on what the incidence of the disease is - with very high infection rates a false positive rate of 4% becomes less important.
7) if you are not hospitalised and I notice madame was - then level may not be protective for very long - oo-er Mrs we havent been told that have we?
8) you can buy it in but the reliability is not well controlled = may well be useless
9) stick tests out side the lab are likely to be less reliable
and that is about it
er someone said there was an article in the times about it and this is anout the article wh is behind a pay wall
I do get the times on paper and read the very article you refer to
I was gonna email Dr Porter and say - if ya dont know what a PPV value(*) is DON'T write on the subject!
I decided to read Sophocles Antigone on the grounds that it was more worth while =I mean have you read the drongo-crip on AB this week - BUT
the nub of Dr Porter;s article for us proles was
1) different to throat scrapes and the test for virus
2) you cant dial one up
3) but they can be ordered for health workers
4) not as useful as you think ( I wondered about that)
5) about 4% are wrong - that appears to be the false pos rate
5a (which leads me to the PPV - naughty boy - the thing you wanna know is - if it is positive, have I had the disease?
This is the PPV and should be above 95%)
6) see 5 - this does not mean the PPV is 96% - the PPV depends also on what the incidence of the disease is - with very high infection rates a false positive rate of 4% becomes less important.
7) if you are not hospitalised and I notice madame was - then level may not be protective for very long - oo-er Mrs we havent been told that have we?
8) you can buy it in but the reliability is not well controlled = may well be useless
9) stick tests out side the lab are likely to be less reliable
and that is about it
er someone said there was an article in the times about it and this is anout the article wh is behind a pay wall
// I realise there’s no guarantee of it not happening again but hopefully , it doesn’t//
er was that second wave?
inevitable they now say -
Germany S Korea singapore and Japan have all had re-outbreaks
Fauci the big fella in America ( the one Trump says he doesnt like morchy ) says - second wave in the land of the Free - we havent got over the first one yet
er was that second wave?
inevitable they now say -
Germany S Korea singapore and Japan have all had re-outbreaks
Fauci the big fella in America ( the one Trump says he doesnt like morchy ) says - second wave in the land of the Free - we havent got over the first one yet
Heard this on the news this afternoon Bobbi ....
https:/ /www.wh fp.com/ 2020/06 /23/sky e-nursi ng-home -worker -positi ve-for- covid-1 9-for-a -second -time/
https:/
various points - people can ignore = djokovic move
where you know what is right and ignore it. He ( D) is an anti-vaxxer, and so yeah ! do the experiment
People ( researchers ) should find out if anti vaxxersa are prepared to take more risk than we do - AND take more rish when it is someone else who foots the bill
ANYWAAAAAAY
there was a computer trial where they looked at mega people - only 20 000, I thought it might be 200 000
and came up with
Old - male - diabetes oh and a late association - Asian.
which we kinda knew anyway. dunno how much it cost
and finally the CMO says that 5% population is antibody positive ( protected. and so refer abovr
1) in one hyndred people - 4 ^ are false positive so that is 3
2) and 5% score positive because they have antibody so that is 5
3) total score is therefore 9 out a hundred
4) of those 9 - - 5 have had the disease
so if you score positive then the chance you are protected is 5/9 or 55% - way below the PPV you want of 95%
( and if the antibody rate is 60% then it swamp the false posirive rate and the chance that your positive result shows you are immune is around 100% )
yeah there will be one or two who can follow this
BUT - all this is available and searchable on the internet
where you know what is right and ignore it. He ( D) is an anti-vaxxer, and so yeah ! do the experiment
People ( researchers ) should find out if anti vaxxersa are prepared to take more risk than we do - AND take more rish when it is someone else who foots the bill
ANYWAAAAAAY
there was a computer trial where they looked at mega people - only 20 000, I thought it might be 200 000
and came up with
Old - male - diabetes oh and a late association - Asian.
which we kinda knew anyway. dunno how much it cost
and finally the CMO says that 5% population is antibody positive ( protected. and so refer abovr
1) in one hyndred people - 4 ^ are false positive so that is 3
2) and 5% score positive because they have antibody so that is 5
3) total score is therefore 9 out a hundred
4) of those 9 - - 5 have had the disease
so if you score positive then the chance you are protected is 5/9 or 55% - way below the PPV you want of 95%
( and if the antibody rate is 60% then it swamp the false posirive rate and the chance that your positive result shows you are immune is around 100% )
yeah there will be one or two who can follow this
BUT - all this is available and searchable on the internet
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.