Film, Media & TV43 mins ago
Probability
5 Answers
How many different linear arrangements are there of the digits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 for which:
(a) 5 and 6 are next to each other ?
(b) 5 is before 6?
(c) 3 is before 4 and 5 is before 6?
(d) 3 and 4 are next to each other and 5 and 6 are also next to each other?
(e) 6 is not last in line?
(a) 5 and 6 are next to each other ?
(b) 5 is before 6?
(c) 3 is before 4 and 5 is before 6?
(d) 3 and 4 are next to each other and 5 and 6 are also next to each other?
(e) 6 is not last in line?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Shamoon713. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Combinatorics isn't my strong suit, but:
(a) can have (56) or (65) in one of five different positions, and remaining 4 numbers can be any way you like, making for a total of 2*5*4! = 240 cases.
(b) if you put 6 in position 1 then there are no cases; in position 2 then you must have 56.... (4! cases);
in position 3 then 5.6... or .56... works (2*4!); in position 4 then 5 has three slots to choose from (3*4!), etc, for a total of (1+2+3+4+5)*4! = 360. The fact that this is exactly half of the available set of permutations suggests that you could also make an argument from probability/symmetry, ie something like P(5 before 6) = P(6 before 5) = 1/2 (because there is no reason to prefer 5 or 6). But I thought of the exhaustive method first.
(a) can have (56) or (65) in one of five different positions, and remaining 4 numbers can be any way you like, making for a total of 2*5*4! = 240 cases.
(b) if you put 6 in position 1 then there are no cases; in position 2 then you must have 56.... (4! cases);
in position 3 then 5.6... or .56... works (2*4!); in position 4 then 5 has three slots to choose from (3*4!), etc, for a total of (1+2+3+4+5)*4! = 360. The fact that this is exactly half of the available set of permutations suggests that you could also make an argument from probability/symmetry, ie something like P(5 before 6) = P(6 before 5) = 1/2 (because there is no reason to prefer 5 or 6). But I thought of the exhaustive method first.