Horror As 'Man Doused In Bleach' In Busy...
News25 mins ago
Are Test Kids For Cvd19 Reliable
14 Answers
been reading many cvd test kits are giving out ositive readings even when they are not ositive
how do yous know these are reliable, would not listen to W.H.O gates foundation,
while here what about the vacinne, will you take it , if so why and how sure are you what would be in that vaccine.
many doctors being blamed on false info had videos taken off youtube , which to me tells that they have something to hide, these are reutable doctors in the field
how do yous know these are reliable, would not listen to W.H.O gates foundation,
while here what about the vacinne, will you take it , if so why and how sure are you what would be in that vaccine.
many doctors being blamed on false info had videos taken off youtube , which to me tells that they have something to hide, these are reutable doctors in the field
Answers
1 to 14 of 14
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by pumpjack. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
no what tells you they are crap is a statistic called PPV ( long words never mind)
that stat is:
what is the chance if I have a positive test that I have had the disease - [this is the antibody test OK yeah?]
20%
so by and large crap - save your moolah
and it goes thus: take a 10 x 10 square - I square is red - the one who has had Covid - running around 1%
The false positive rate is 4% - colour four more squares pinko
the chance of having had the disease wivva positive test - is - - -
( 1) red
over all the red and pinks - 5 - - and that is 20%
they are talking today about 4% true positive rate four in a hundred have had covid
so that is four over (four plus four) - 50%
flip of a coin - at present
;
since the test is so reliant on the number already infected [low] compared to the error ( false positive ) rate around 5
they arent much good these days - as more and more people show signs of infection a positive result is more useful
the Beeb hack ALMOST got it right at interview this morning
" taking into account the false positives, if the rate of infection is low then these tests arent much good are they ? "
the expert certainly wasnt expecting THAT !
that stat is:
what is the chance if I have a positive test that I have had the disease - [this is the antibody test OK yeah?]
20%
so by and large crap - save your moolah
and it goes thus: take a 10 x 10 square - I square is red - the one who has had Covid - running around 1%
The false positive rate is 4% - colour four more squares pinko
the chance of having had the disease wivva positive test - is - - -
( 1) red
over all the red and pinks - 5 - - and that is 20%
they are talking today about 4% true positive rate four in a hundred have had covid
so that is four over (four plus four) - 50%
flip of a coin - at present
;
since the test is so reliant on the number already infected [low] compared to the error ( false positive ) rate around 5
they arent much good these days - as more and more people show signs of infection a positive result is more useful
the Beeb hack ALMOST got it right at interview this morning
" taking into account the false positives, if the rate of infection is low then these tests arent much good are they ? "
the expert certainly wasnt expecting THAT !
"been reading many cvd test kits are giving out ositive readings even when they are not ositive"
I didn't understand your question pumpy as if your test comes back positive, then how do you know that you are wrong and that actually you do not have the virus?
I assume that you are not talking about the antigen test and I am sure that in PPs post of 17.46 you will find the answer.
I will take 5he vaccine if offered as that will be,at the moment, my best shot of survival.
I didn't understand your question pumpy as if your test comes back positive, then how do you know that you are wrong and that actually you do not have the virus?
I assume that you are not talking about the antigen test and I am sure that in PPs post of 17.46 you will find the answer.
I will take 5he vaccine if offered as that will be,at the moment, my best shot of survival.
// then how do you know that you are wrong and that actually you do not have the virus?//
on a 20 - 80 split - for no - you would take the bet wouldnt you?(*)
which means the test adds no information at present constituted
and yeah I wd take the vaccine if offered
or not - that is buy if not offered
but there again I worked at Porton DOwn so am chronically very vacciney
(*) bone marrow transplant has a 20% cure rate in lymphoma and so I didnt feel so bad when I was refused on
on a 20 - 80 split - for no - you would take the bet wouldnt you?(*)
which means the test adds no information at present constituted
and yeah I wd take the vaccine if offered
or not - that is buy if not offered
but there again I worked at Porton DOwn so am chronically very vacciney
(*) bone marrow transplant has a 20% cure rate in lymphoma and so I didnt feel so bad when I was refused on
didnt dr fuchi admit that vacinnes usually take 9 yrs to study and develoe , i seen the recording of this myself .
watch this , only 1 of many many doctors, many have been taken of youtube. ......... https:/
i wont be taking any vaccine from gates foundation, didnt he kill thousands of children in india and africa
watch this , only 1 of many many doctors, many have been taken of youtube. ......... https:/
i wont be taking any vaccine from gates foundation, didnt he kill thousands of children in india and africa
// i wont be taking any vaccine from gates foundation, didnt he kill thousands of children in india and africa//
erm no he didnt - (yeah yeah oK some crazy said he did)
what he DID do was double the moolah on Malaria research by giving £25 000 000
( you mean the original budget was a measly ....... yup)
erm no he didnt - (yeah yeah oK some crazy said he did)
what he DID do was double the moolah on Malaria research by giving £25 000 000
( you mean the original budget was a measly ....... yup)
// didnt dr fauci admit that vacinnes usually take 9 yrs to study and develoe , i seen the recording of this myself .//
yes - no - he said that was par for the course (no admission there)
and we are doing it much more quickly now
meaning - - or indicating
that the rules that had to be followed which lengthened it to eight years were not in the patients' interests
( classical example of over-regulation)
Fauci has gone very quiet recently - - no one knows why
yes - no - he said that was par for the course (no admission there)
and we are doing it much more quickly now
meaning - - or indicating
that the rules that had to be followed which lengthened it to eight years were not in the patients' interests
( classical example of over-regulation)
Fauci has gone very quiet recently - - no one knows why
// didnt dr fauci admit that vacinnes usually take 9 yrs to study and develoe , i seen the recording of this myself .//
yes - no - he said that was par for the course (no admission there)
and we are doing it much more quickly now
meaning - - or indicating
that the rules that had to be followed which lengthened it to eight years were not in the patients' interests
( classical example of over-regulation)
Fauci has gone very quiet recently - - no one knows why
Its amazing how a pandemic focusses the mind though
yes - no - he said that was par for the course (no admission there)
and we are doing it much more quickly now
meaning - - or indicating
that the rules that had to be followed which lengthened it to eight years were not in the patients' interests
( classical example of over-regulation)
Fauci has gone very quiet recently - - no one knows why
Its amazing how a pandemic focusses the mind though
https:/
only 1 reason why i do not trust WHO
and why are all these pchysisits & doctors professionals in their field being banned and taken off google and youtube, i do not believe a lot of what is going on with this whole thing,
something just not right !!!!!!
only 1 reason why i do not trust WHO
and why are all these pchysisits & doctors professionals in their field being banned and taken off google and youtube, i do not believe a lot of what is going on with this whole thing,
something just not right !!!!!!
1 to 14 of 14
Latest Posts
Film, Media & TV38 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles50 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles75 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles81 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles95 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.