Barsel - // andy, this article was written in 2013 when he was 74yrs old and is actually about how his looks have changed which is what nailit's post is about. I know the other things you mentioned about him, but that's not what this is about.He was good looking when he was young, but to me it looks like he's had some plastic surgery that's gone wrong.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2317732/Ageing-musician-Dave-Clark-looks-unrecognisable-rapidly-changing-face.html //
Thanks for the link.
It is a particularly spiteful piece of writing, and spurious at best.
Absolutely any and all pop stars from the sixties are now 'ageing musicians' - they really can't be anything else!
As for his 'very young outfit' - what on earth does that mean?
I am nearly sixty-six and I only ever wear Levi jeans and my choice of shoes is Doc Martens - but I hardly think they are 'young' - they are simply what I prefer, not because I imagine they are 'young. or that they make me look 'young' either.
Perhaps if Mr Clarke had turned out in a cardie with a drip-dry shirt with stains down it, and corduroy trousers and Corfam shoes, that would have fitted the image the journalist seems to think he should have.
As far as the surgery is concerned, I would concede that it is not flattering, but if he wants to spend some of his multi-millions holding off the ageing process, then good luck to him - pity he wasn't better advised about his choice of surgeon.