ChatterBank0 min ago
Was Anne Boylen Black?
Rewriting history for the sake of diversity, perhaps Davis Jason could play Nelson Mandela.
https:/ /uk.reu ters.co m/artic le/uk-b ritain- film-bo leyn/bl ack-act or-turn er-smit h-to-pl ay-engl ish-que en-anne -boleyn -in-new -drama- idUKKBN 27F26W
https:/ /www.th esun.co .uk/tv/ 1306580 9/chann el-5-ra ce-row- black-a ctress- play-an ne-bole yn/
https:/
https:/
Answers
Personally, If it's going on the TV as a serious program, I would rather a white man play Buzz Aldrin A black man play Muhammad Ali A white woman play Margret Thatcher A black woman play Florence Griffith Joyner A white man play Hitler A black man play Idi Amin etc. Theatres or local plays, ok...but not TV or films that are supposedly based on fact. I do realise that...
21:38 Fri 30th Oct 2020
Ellipsis - // Amazing the tiny things that people will take great offence at, isn't it? //
That's the wonderful mystery of human nature - one man's tiny thing is another man's offence - just as one man's legitiate question is another man' s invitation to a fight, but let's not go down that path again!
That's the wonderful mystery of human nature - one man's tiny thing is another man's offence - just as one man's legitiate question is another man' s invitation to a fight, but let's not go down that path again!
-- answer removed --
Mozz - //
Question to anyone taking umbridge with this: What foes it really matter? Would you be offended if she had the wrong hair colour? Was the wrong height or weight? //
The subject of actors playing roles that do not confirm with their ethncitiy is one that has been debated on here many times, this is just one more example.
I find the notion interesting, but some people appear uncomfortable with an actor not playing within their ethnic range - hence this thread - well, most of it anyway!!
Question to anyone taking umbridge with this: What foes it really matter? Would you be offended if she had the wrong hair colour? Was the wrong height or weight? //
The subject of actors playing roles that do not confirm with their ethncitiy is one that has been debated on here many times, this is just one more example.
I find the notion interesting, but some people appear uncomfortable with an actor not playing within their ethnic range - hence this thread - well, most of it anyway!!
no DTC DENZIL! https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Denzi l_Tulse r
allen - // All women are at a disadvantage in life. In the 16th century, being a woman at court must have been even worse than being a peasant’s wife.
Strikes me that black women too are doubly disadvantaged - as women, and as black women! //
I am not a historian, but the present Mrs Hughes is, and on enquiring, I am advised that the position of a woman at court depended largely on a combination of her connections - either inherited or created, and her ability to use them to advance her position.
Strikes me that black women too are doubly disadvantaged - as women, and as black women! //
I am not a historian, but the present Mrs Hughes is, and on enquiring, I am advised that the position of a woman at court depended largely on a combination of her connections - either inherited or created, and her ability to use them to advance her position.
And to marry whoever men chose, and (in Henry VIII’s case), to be murdered at a husband’s whim.
My point is that ‘courtly’ women were in a double bind, and there are parallels to black women today, fighting racial prejudice and exploitation as women.
I would not have wanted to be a woman then, nor now.
My point is that ‘courtly’ women were in a double bind, and there are parallels to black women today, fighting racial prejudice and exploitation as women.
I would not have wanted to be a woman then, nor now.
allen - // nd to marry whoever men chose, and (in Henry VIII’s case), to be murdered at a husband’s whim.
My point is that ‘courtly’ women were in a double bind, and there are parallels to black women today, fighting racial prejudice and exploitation as women.
I would not have wanted to be a woman then, nor now. //
I take your point - I guess as well as a matter of connections and ability as I mentioned, it was also a matter of chance as to which man (always more powerful of course) decided to change the course of a woman's life for better or worse.
My point is that ‘courtly’ women were in a double bind, and there are parallels to black women today, fighting racial prejudice and exploitation as women.
I would not have wanted to be a woman then, nor now. //
I take your point - I guess as well as a matter of connections and ability as I mentioned, it was also a matter of chance as to which man (always more powerful of course) decided to change the course of a woman's life for better or worse.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.