How Bad Was My Attempt In Approaching...
Family & Relationships1 min ago
Has Anyone Reported Neighbours
59 Answers
for having people visit ?
I reported a neighbour tonight for a noise disturbance.
The police said they couldn't help with the noise issue but could assist with them having people over with the covid crisis. I didn't report that. I didnt see them attend.
I reported a neighbour tonight for a noise disturbance.
The police said they couldn't help with the noise issue but could assist with them having people over with the covid crisis. I didn't report that. I didnt see them attend.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by seanne. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
seanne - surely the Council SHOULD act? You need to keep on at them and even maybe write to the Chief Executive of your local Council if they don't act to complain about them. They are supposed to take noise nuisance seriously. I feel for you, I really do. It's awful having noisy neighbours, I've been there, but luckily the landlord kicked them out for having a dog when they weren't allowed. I believe they are causing problems elsewhere now. Don't give up on the Council helping you x
Both you and the other neighbour you have mentioned should contact the council. If its affecting more than one household there will be more credibility.
With my case that I mentioned before, several others were impacted by the noise and reported it. So it wasn't just me and neighbour on the other side of her.
With my case that I mentioned before, several others were impacted by the noise and reported it. So it wasn't just me and neighbour on the other side of her.
Official Government advice is to contact your local Council in respect of noisy neighbours.
https:/
https:/
Hans.
https:/
https:/
Hans.
//I knew you could check for tax....just not MOT.//
It is provided all under the same enquiry, ummm:
https:/
//Shame because thats why virus keeps spreading.//
You’re being led up the garden path. The virus keeps spreading because that’s what respiratory viruses do. The only way to prevent it is to isolate everybody from everybody else 24/7. They may not then contract the virus but they’d quickly die of something else. Believing this spread can be contained by preventing people having their friends in for a cup of tea is a fallacy.
//Altho reporting neighboors isnt the way to go a would report the hairdresser business.//
No it certainly isn’t the way to go – especially when it is doing no harm. This is not East Germany in the 1960s. The people who are being harmed are the High Street hairdressers who have been compulsorily closed for the second time in nine months. Quite a few of them will not reopen and it will be up to people like my neighbour to pick up the slack.
It is provided all under the same enquiry, ummm:
https:/
//Shame because thats why virus keeps spreading.//
You’re being led up the garden path. The virus keeps spreading because that’s what respiratory viruses do. The only way to prevent it is to isolate everybody from everybody else 24/7. They may not then contract the virus but they’d quickly die of something else. Believing this spread can be contained by preventing people having their friends in for a cup of tea is a fallacy.
//Altho reporting neighboors isnt the way to go a would report the hairdresser business.//
No it certainly isn’t the way to go – especially when it is doing no harm. This is not East Germany in the 1960s. The people who are being harmed are the High Street hairdressers who have been compulsorily closed for the second time in nine months. Quite a few of them will not reopen and it will be up to people like my neighbour to pick up the slack.
Some selfish communities still "don't get it", as cops found when they raided a wedding party at, wait for it, a furniture factory in Blackburn two days ago. I feel very sorry that police should have to put their own health at risk to deal with these ignorant and blatant breaches of current public health restrictions.
According to the judge "You’re being led up the garden path. The virus keeps spreading because that’s what respiratory viruses do." spungle.
Nothing to do with the selfish peopel who dont follow the rules and guidance reagrding gatherings, social distancing, minimising contacts. So says the judge
Unbeleivable.
Nothing to do with the selfish peopel who dont follow the rules and guidance reagrding gatherings, social distancing, minimising contacts. So says the judge
Unbeleivable.
Yes, the judge siding with the defendants against the evidence is unfortunately another sign of just how corrupt Lancashire has become. We see it every day, in the local councils, the local football teams, the police and the judiciary- some communities are seemingly immune to prosecution and friends in high places will ensure justice is avoided. Sad state of affairs, but not much optimism the tide will ever turn here.
//One of my near neighbours runs a hairdressing business from home and has actually seen an increase in business during High Street closures.//
Hairdressers who work from home and mobile hairdressers come under exactly the same rules as hairdressing salons. They cannot work at the moment.
My mobile hairdresser is a stickler for the rules and has thoroughly checked this out.
Hairdressers who work from home and mobile hairdressers come under exactly the same rules as hairdressing salons. They cannot work at the moment.
My mobile hairdresser is a stickler for the rules and has thoroughly checked this out.
//Hairdressers who work from home and mobile hairdressers come under exactly the same rules as hairdressing salons. They cannot work at the moment.//
Yes I know they do. But they are working. I was illustrating how this latest "lockdown" is not being observed by many and those to suffer are those running businesses that can be easily controlled.
//Nothing to do with the selfish peopel who dont follow the rules and guidance reagrding gatherings, social distancing, minimising contacts. So says the judge
Unbeleivable.//
Well let’s have a look at recent events.
Wales had a “firebreak” lockdown from 23rd October to the 9th November. In the week before that began, Covid hospital admissions averaged 90 per day. In the week after it ended (up to 16th November) they averaged 88. On 23rd October there were 571 people in Welsh hospitals with Covid. On 16th November there were 1,127. There was only one day during that period when the number of people in hospital decreased and that was 13th November when they went down by 6 from 1,066 to 1,060. It is now well over three weeks since that lockdown began - plenty of time for its effects to feed through to hospital cases - and there is no sign whatsoever that infections – certainly those serious enough to require hospitalisation - are easing. On the contrary they have more than doubled.
Meanwhile in England – where the latest lockdown did not begin until the Welsh version was almost ended - there was a similar increase in numbers in hospital from 6,518 to 13,468. But for much of that period (from 23rd October to 5th November) a good proportion of England was under far more relaxed rules where people could “gather” indoors up to six in number. Even where they could not, shops, hairdressers, pubs and restaurants remained open.
Of course you will say that without the “firebreak” Wales would have fared much worse. Well England didn’t – it fared about the same so I will say that you have no evidence to support that. So what I find “unbelievable” is that you can consider it is worthwhile closing huge swathes of the economy when the results I have provided are much the same.
The country has been conned again by the scientists. They produced blood-curdling graphs which predicted 4,000 deaths a day by the end of November. We’re two thirds through the month now and there seems little likelihood that figure will be anywhere near accurate. Those figures were produced using duff data, the authors accept this but now make pains to point out that the numbers were not “predictions” but “projections". That use of semantics has closed England down for four weeks and many businesses that closed will not reopen. But, as no doubt you will say, that is just a minor inconvenience and not worth fretting over.
So back to my point which you dismissed as unbelievable - viruses spread and fannying about with face coverings and "social distancing" will not stop that. The only way to stop it is to confine everybody to their homes 24/7 and obviously that cannot be done.
Yes I know they do. But they are working. I was illustrating how this latest "lockdown" is not being observed by many and those to suffer are those running businesses that can be easily controlled.
//Nothing to do with the selfish peopel who dont follow the rules and guidance reagrding gatherings, social distancing, minimising contacts. So says the judge
Unbeleivable.//
Well let’s have a look at recent events.
Wales had a “firebreak” lockdown from 23rd October to the 9th November. In the week before that began, Covid hospital admissions averaged 90 per day. In the week after it ended (up to 16th November) they averaged 88. On 23rd October there were 571 people in Welsh hospitals with Covid. On 16th November there were 1,127. There was only one day during that period when the number of people in hospital decreased and that was 13th November when they went down by 6 from 1,066 to 1,060. It is now well over three weeks since that lockdown began - plenty of time for its effects to feed through to hospital cases - and there is no sign whatsoever that infections – certainly those serious enough to require hospitalisation - are easing. On the contrary they have more than doubled.
Meanwhile in England – where the latest lockdown did not begin until the Welsh version was almost ended - there was a similar increase in numbers in hospital from 6,518 to 13,468. But for much of that period (from 23rd October to 5th November) a good proportion of England was under far more relaxed rules where people could “gather” indoors up to six in number. Even where they could not, shops, hairdressers, pubs and restaurants remained open.
Of course you will say that without the “firebreak” Wales would have fared much worse. Well England didn’t – it fared about the same so I will say that you have no evidence to support that. So what I find “unbelievable” is that you can consider it is worthwhile closing huge swathes of the economy when the results I have provided are much the same.
The country has been conned again by the scientists. They produced blood-curdling graphs which predicted 4,000 deaths a day by the end of November. We’re two thirds through the month now and there seems little likelihood that figure will be anywhere near accurate. Those figures were produced using duff data, the authors accept this but now make pains to point out that the numbers were not “predictions” but “projections". That use of semantics has closed England down for four weeks and many businesses that closed will not reopen. But, as no doubt you will say, that is just a minor inconvenience and not worth fretting over.
So back to my point which you dismissed as unbelievable - viruses spread and fannying about with face coverings and "social distancing" will not stop that. The only way to stop it is to confine everybody to their homes 24/7 and obviously that cannot be done.
