News5 mins ago
Britain France Reach Sign-Agreement Prevent Migrants Crossing English Channel
Answers
1 to 18 of 18
Meanwhile, back at the Channel... There are already numerous legal crossings available from Northern France, people have been using them for years, they're called ferries and are quite reasonably priced, hardly ever involving an enabler for vast amounts of money. If 'we' don't want dead children bobbing up on beaches all that needs to be done is educate...
10:36 Sun 29th Nov 2020
All sorted then.
//Speaking inside the Foreign Office, the home secretary said the €31.4 million (£28.2m) agreement would also see more invested in technologies and surveillance to curb the number of crossings being made.//
I seem to recall we shelled out a huge amount to reinforce the port of Calais. I wonder how the expense of this "agreement" was split.
//Speaking inside the Foreign Office, the home secretary said the €31.4 million (£28.2m) agreement would also see more invested in technologies and surveillance to curb the number of crossings being made.//
I seem to recall we shelled out a huge amount to reinforce the port of Calais. I wonder how the expense of this "agreement" was split.
Well, I don't want to go to war with France. But it is true that we paid a huge amount to the French to stop this ages ago and we know what happened. Footage of French ships escorting dinghies to British waters, remember? The French people are one thing - French politicians and current situation with Macron is another.
I missed the 'Send them back to France' bullet point somehow. Anyway, we should soon be able to send illegal immigrants (word is 'illegal') back to where they came from.
I missed the 'Send them back to France' bullet point somehow. Anyway, we should soon be able to send illegal immigrants (word is 'illegal') back to where they came from.
//Anyway, we should soon be able to send illegal immigrants (word is 'illegal') back to where they came from.//
We're already able to do that. We simply choose not to. And while attitudes like this prevail:
"Bella Sankey, from Detention Action, added: "No amount of massaging the numbers masks (the home secretary's) refusal to take the sensible step of creating a safe and legal route to the UK from northern France, thereby preventing crossings and child deaths."
We never will.
We're already able to do that. We simply choose not to. And while attitudes like this prevail:
"Bella Sankey, from Detention Action, added: "No amount of massaging the numbers masks (the home secretary's) refusal to take the sensible step of creating a safe and legal route to the UK from northern France, thereby preventing crossings and child deaths."
We never will.
Meanwhile, back at the Channel...
There are already numerous legal crossings available from Northern France, people have been using them for years, they're called ferries and are quite reasonably priced, hardly ever involving an enabler for vast amounts of money.
If 'we' don't want dead children bobbing up on beaches all that needs to be done is educate their moronic parents and disband dodgy looking welcome parties who think it's okay to arrive by the back door.
There are already numerous legal crossings available from Northern France, people have been using them for years, they're called ferries and are quite reasonably priced, hardly ever involving an enabler for vast amounts of money.
If 'we' don't want dead children bobbing up on beaches all that needs to be done is educate their moronic parents and disband dodgy looking welcome parties who think it's okay to arrive by the back door.
1 to 18 of 18
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.