following the resignation of Professor Kathleen Stock, academia has said that universities must exist to uphold academic freedoms, and they should “stop pretending there is no crisis of free speech and start paying attention to the problem and trying to solve it”.
should students and academics be free to challenge without fear of cancellation, or worse? or are some views just too toxic to be shared with the young and vulnerable?
Calling them names doesn't address the issue and neither does dismissing them as attention seekers . What they're doing is working - and that should worry everyone who recognises the value of freedom of speech.
It very much worries me, too, naomi. I have a close relative who will no longer speak to me because she cannot accept that I hold different opinions on something and will not be talked out of them. She says it is 'to protect her sanity'. I have mentioned the Voltairian principle, but to no avail. Horribly divisive society, we now have.
Her 'sanity' must be particularly sensitive if she can't interact with a person who has a different opinion to her. I am dreading the anadyne world of the future everybody thinking the same saying the same, acting the same.
Naomi; 13:32. You're not keen on people calling names? What do you make of serial name-callers like those who use terms like Nazis and Fifth-Columnists, and Nasty Lefties etc? I don't think the 'lefties' here use such inflammatory terminology.
Atheist, I think the people you refer to very often don’t understand politics - just as those who call anyone with an education or who are comfortably off ‘toffs’ fail to understand that good breeding doesn’t equate to money and privilege.