Lord Rothermere Has Lost It With Johnson

[FatticusInch]

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/theres-bad-news-in-the-mail-for-boris-johnson/

Seems like the owner of the Mail, a previously pro-Johnson paper has realised that backing him is no longer a viable option and that he doesn’t reflect the views of the papers readers.

https://adambienkov.substack.com/p/the-mail-turning-on-boris-johnson

Living on borrowed time.

[Peter Pedant]

// What question do you want me to answer, FatticusInch?//
er start at No 1 please - - ter daah ! + smiley icon

[naomi24]

PP, I think you might have missed one or two of my posts this morning. Still, no doubt you'll catch up at some time.

[FatticusInch]

Lol, have another go Naomi, they’re in the thread.
Traitor? Like the recent 148 you mean? Ok.
Wonky deal? You mean like the ‘oven-ready’ slops that Johnson is currently dishing up?
Country going to Hell in a handcart and all you can do is blindly try to protect the PM, just like the sycophants in cabinet.
You’re looking increasingly likely to replace Mad Nad as Johnson’s number one admirer, but then she’s not in touch with reality either, lol.

[naomi24]

Now come, come, FatticusInch. You really can't expect me to trawl all the way back through your incessant ramblings in search of an elusive question. Spit it out man!

[FatticusInch]

Ok, for the hard of understanding.

Has the Daily Mail changed its previous stance on Johnson and his government.
They were renowned as being previously supportive, now they’re critical.
Yes or no?

List the redeeming features that Johnson has in contrast to Tugendhat or any other Tory MP with credibility.

Number one should be easy even for you, number two could prove a tad more difficult but still, let’s have a laugh, sorry, I mean a list.

[FatticusInch]

To make it even easier for you, ‘trawling through all my incessant ramblings’ amounts to 4 before you responded inadequately to the questions.
Read them again slowly, though I can already imagine your lips moving as you do so.
Take your time.

[FatticusInch]

Todays front pages.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-62031941

[naomi24]

1. According to Togo who has read today's Mail, there's nothing in it to indicate a change of stance. Perhaps you’re easily led., FatticusInch, old bean.

2. Tut! Easy! Nothing redeems people who flout the result of a democratic election, and by extension, hold the electorate in disdain - so Boris wins that one hands down. Got your incontinence pants handy?

[Old_Geezer]

Boris has more redeeming features that most MPs. He sided with the democratic majority of the public, bore the attacks of the antidemocratic dregs, got Brexit done albiet with issues that presumably he couldn't get the EU to drop, and has tried what he can to achieve the changes needed. As such he stands as a beacon of light among the dross who have managed to get elected but are apparently only really concerned with doing down the general public.

[FatticusInch]

Rofl at the permanently deluded Borstriches.
Never mind Naomi, 0/10, no hope for you nor the other Johnson sycophants.

[naomi24]

:o)

[FatticusInch]

Old_Geezer,
//As such he stands as a beacon of light among the dross//

Lol, you sound worse than Dorries! Or are the dross the rest of the Tory party?

[Zacs-Master]

And yet another week passes on Answerbank. And still the same cries of ‘Johnson must go’. And still zero action being taken on doing anything.

[youngmafbog]

The thing is Johnson is going nowhere.

Not that I am happy with that but its the way things are, a vote was had those of us who wanted him gone have lost so time to move forward and press Johnson to get his act together and lead the Nation to prosperity.

He can do it but he really has to drop the green nonsense and become a Tory. Even if that does cause problems in the marital bed.

[Gromit]

// More than 70 local constituency chairs have signed a motion calling for an emergency meeting of the National Conservative Convention, which represents the grassroots membership. This could pass a symbolic vote of no-confidence – though neither the 1922 Committee nor the NCC can force May to step down.

Evans said the combined force of the parliamentary party and the grassroots meant May should “accept the fact the call for her resignation now is growing into a clamour”. //

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/apr/23/may-should-go-today-says-senior-1922-committee-member-nigel-evans

And she walked. Johnson would go if he was to have another bad VONC.

[Gromit]

ZacsMaster
// And yet another week passes on Answerbank. And still the same cries of ‘Johnson must go’. And still zero action being taken on doing anything. //

Let’s wait and see what the 1922 Committee elections this week, throw up.

[Zacs-Master]

Gromit. Indeed. Not a lot would be my guess.

[Peter Pedant]

//I know that doesnt fit your agenda but its fact.//

whenever I see someone state that it is a fact on AB
I roar with laughter

( Loosely based on Thoreau: if a man talks about his honour, I start to count the silver cutlery)

[Peter Pedant]

And still the same cries of ‘Johnson must go’. And still zero action being taken on doing anything. //

um - er - - are we meant to go out and shoot him? Bad idea I add

[Peter Pedant]

and by extension, hold the electorate in disdain -
well said Naomi
the electorate here is - Honition and Tiverton voters
and their voice of disapproval and disgust in unheard

oh no no reader - she is referring to another electorate - ( which includes her children and mother in law and the gardener probably)