Quizzes & Puzzles30 mins ago
Truss: Ethics Advisor Not Needed
21 Answers
https:/ /www.in depende nt.co.u k/news/ uk/poli tics/li z-truss -boris- ethics- adviser -b21511 80.html ?amp
Lol, of course not, she’s already transgressed enough!
From another source.
Liz Truss is coming under criticism - and also drawing support - for her statement last night that she would not commit to appointing an independent ethics adviser.
She said: "For me, it's about understanding the difference between right and wrong.
"I have always acted with integrity... I don't think you can outsource ethics."
However, Gavin Barwell, the Downing Street chief of staff under Theresa May, said such a move would be unwise.
He said: "She will discover that when you have to sack one of your ministers - possibly a close friend - it is actually helpful to a prime minister to have an independent figure confirm that they have broken the ministerial code, rather than that having to be your judgement alone."
Does knowing the difference include adultery?
Or watching on and being complicit and supportive of a PM who was lying to colleagues, Parliament and public alike?
At least her future cabinet know that shagging about won’t cost them their job
Lurching from a disaster to a shambles, being played out in front of our very eyes.
Lol, of course not, she’s already transgressed enough!
From another source.
Liz Truss is coming under criticism - and also drawing support - for her statement last night that she would not commit to appointing an independent ethics adviser.
She said: "For me, it's about understanding the difference between right and wrong.
"I have always acted with integrity... I don't think you can outsource ethics."
However, Gavin Barwell, the Downing Street chief of staff under Theresa May, said such a move would be unwise.
He said: "She will discover that when you have to sack one of your ministers - possibly a close friend - it is actually helpful to a prime minister to have an independent figure confirm that they have broken the ministerial code, rather than that having to be your judgement alone."
Does knowing the difference include adultery?
Or watching on and being complicit and supportive of a PM who was lying to colleagues, Parliament and public alike?
At least her future cabinet know that shagging about won’t cost them their job
Lurching from a disaster to a shambles, being played out in front of our very eyes.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FatticusInch. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.