News1 min ago
Labour M P Stands Down
20 Answers
After sexual misconduct allegations.
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-polit ics-633 44752
Good, need to rid Parliament of this type of behaviour and style of politician.
https:/
Good, need to rid Parliament of this type of behaviour and style of politician.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FatticusInch. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.photo with 'look what I have down here' look on his fdace
Kier must be apoplectic - as Christian insists that Boris seems to be able to screw whimever he likes - and Kier yells - that is Boris for chrissakes
and Kier goes on - all you had to do was keep your payants arn
Xtian oo you have been watching Judge Judy
Sir K for it is he: and we wait and we get power just like Tony Blair
Like the last Major months - incredibles
Kier must be apoplectic - as Christian insists that Boris seems to be able to screw whimever he likes - and Kier yells - that is Boris for chrissakes
and Kier goes on - all you had to do was keep your payants arn
Xtian oo you have been watching Judge Judy
Sir K for it is he: and we wait and we get power just like Tony Blair
Like the last Major months - incredibles
davebro
//must have pained you to post this fatti - well done!//
Erm…..how/why?
It’s acknowledging a recorded and documented factual event reported on by a credible news source, why wouldn’t I?
You and the Borstriches should try it some time, it’ll make you a bit more balanced than some machine-gun toting lunatic with a pathological hatred of illegal immigrants.
Give it a go.
//must have pained you to post this fatti - well done!//
Erm…..how/why?
It’s acknowledging a recorded and documented factual event reported on by a credible news source, why wouldn’t I?
You and the Borstriches should try it some time, it’ll make you a bit more balanced than some machine-gun toting lunatic with a pathological hatred of illegal immigrants.
Give it a go.
// the main difference being they acted on it //
The Labour Party didn’t act on anything, the independent parliamentary watchdog gave a 4 week suspension.
As for his insincere apology, it was straight out of Boris’ playbook. An independent panel found him guilty but he insists he did nothing wrong. Good riddance.
The Labour Party didn’t act on anything, the independent parliamentary watchdog gave a 4 week suspension.
As for his insincere apology, it was straight out of Boris’ playbook. An independent panel found him guilty but he insists he did nothing wrong. Good riddance.
// On 21 May 2021 the complainant, a young woman and junior member of the respondent MP’s Parliamentary team, made a complaint under the House of Commons Independent Complaints Grievance Scheme (ICGS). She alleged that the respondent had behaved inappropriately towards her on a number of occasions, each involving sexual misconduct.
The conduct complained of included the following: inappropriate sexual remarks about other women; invading the complainant’s personal space and unwanted touching at work social events; inappropriate and unwanted hugs; a sexually motivated invitation to take a secret trip to Gibraltar; and sexually motivated incidents at and after a formal work social dinner, with personal comments about her looks, linking arms, holding her hand, holding her by the arms, inviting her to come back to his flat, two kisses on the forehead and an attempted kiss on the mouth, all of which were unwanted and unwelcome.
The respondent denied the more serious allegations. He accepted that he had been in breach of the Sexual Misconduct Policy after the formal dinner because he kissed her on the forehead. He also accepted that he had blurred the boundaries between employer and employee and been too ‘fatherly’ and ‘friendly’. But he denied that he was ‘sexually motivated’ at any time.
The complaint was investigated under the ICGS and on 13 July 2022 the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards (the Commissioner) found certain allegations of sexual misconduct proved. The Commissioner found that all conduct complained of (except the invasion of personal space) was proved and involved breaches of the Behaviour Code. //
https:/ /www.pa rliamen t.uk/gl obalass ets/mps -lords- -office s/stand ards-an d-finan cial-in terests /indepe ndent-e xpert-p anel/hc -823--- the-con duct-of -mr-chr istian- matheso n-mp.pd f
The conduct complained of included the following: inappropriate sexual remarks about other women; invading the complainant’s personal space and unwanted touching at work social events; inappropriate and unwanted hugs; a sexually motivated invitation to take a secret trip to Gibraltar; and sexually motivated incidents at and after a formal work social dinner, with personal comments about her looks, linking arms, holding her hand, holding her by the arms, inviting her to come back to his flat, two kisses on the forehead and an attempted kiss on the mouth, all of which were unwanted and unwelcome.
The respondent denied the more serious allegations. He accepted that he had been in breach of the Sexual Misconduct Policy after the formal dinner because he kissed her on the forehead. He also accepted that he had blurred the boundaries between employer and employee and been too ‘fatherly’ and ‘friendly’. But he denied that he was ‘sexually motivated’ at any time.
The complaint was investigated under the ICGS and on 13 July 2022 the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards (the Commissioner) found certain allegations of sexual misconduct proved. The Commissioner found that all conduct complained of (except the invasion of personal space) was proved and involved breaches of the Behaviour Code. //
https:/