I am generally opposed to Capital Punishment since it authenticates the taking of life. But my convictions are sometimes sorely tried, as in the case of the unspeakable *** who set fire to these three lovely people's house, killing all three.
As capital punishment is ruled out (it is) & some murderers take their own life (thinking Fred West & Harold Shipman) should not all those convicted of murder be allowed to opt for voluntary euthanasia at any stage of their imprisonment?
remember that ian brady asked for the death penalty rather than life improsonment and attempted to bargain information about his victims for it.... a lot of particularly nasty murderers ask for the death penalty too...
regardless as jno says absolute proof does not exist so if we reintroduce it then we're guaranteeing that at least some innocent people will be executed by the state
Nah,too much wokeist eejits in the UK now for that to happen,Canary.Probably the murderous *** that did this will get a slap on the wrist or a few years in some comfortable jail.
A jury would be far less likely to find the accused guilty of murder if they knew they were handing out a death penalty - what if they were wrong? So, more murderers found guilty of manslaughter.
When a person commits murder they believe they have the right to kill, that the victim deserves to die. How is that different to capital punishment?
Albert Pierrepoint became opposed to capital punishment claiming it was 'nothing more than revenge'.
davebro: "I knew that PP - please don't keep implying that I am stupid. " - ha ha dave we are all stupid according to the pan dimensional hyper being that is PP.
It is a question of belief/faith that the dead don't know they're dead. The majority of humanity believes in some kind of continuation, and this seems supported by many NDEs reported. It may be that after the deed has been done the executed individual thanks you profusely for getting them in to heaven that bit quicker.