I definitely agree, there are areas where pharmacists can help, Definitely not with antibiotics except maybe topical ones. I would like to see some areas of care fully removed from GPs, most wound care ,tissue viability, falls to community nurses. Let them run proper clinics, with potentially wider prescribing powers within that the only extra thing they need is the right to refer to dermatology/ plastics whe 're retirement. t skin grafting is needed. They also already do most of the day to day asthma and diabetic management, maybe that could also be expanded. We also probably need the polyclinic idea to be utilised properly. Xray, blood tests, community physio, are three areas that need a proper centre in every town and a few in each city. Those patients shouldn't be take time in hospital as out patients. The hospital teams should be focused on in patients and in the case of physics and OTs with a view to improving discharge Putting them closer to patients rather than centralised means patients who couldn't go across town to an appointment at a major hospital ( maybe tying up a transport ambulance) could get to one much nearer under their own steam, I have excluded speech therapists and some of the others as they are very few and far between so may need to work from a central setting. I believe the whole system needs proper analysis, and the long term may require a radical approach in higher education alongside it.
Here's a thought. How about fully funding (including basic living expenses) for those wanting to be doctors, physios,dietitians, etc. Yes eventually they may well end up in very well paid roles, but we will get a return anyway in their normal tax burden. It should I believe be part of long term planning, .