ChatterBank4 mins ago
Boris Is On The Case Re Ulez
"Great news that the High Court has today granted permission to proceed for Hillingdon Council's judicial review of Sadiq Khan’s mad ULEZ expansion and his woefully inadequate scrappage scheme. Khan’s plans would exclude the many hard-working people who need to travel into greater London, damaging businesses and services across the outer boroughs and I once again call on the Mayor to do the right thing and stop the ULEZ expansion!"
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lankeela. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//Need to?//
Yes Zacs. Many people - particularly trade people such as plumbers, carpenters, general builders and so on need to travel either into Greater London from outside or around it to conduct their business. They cannot get on a bus with all their tools and materials; they cannot go by push bike. As well as them there are shop workers, hospital staff and many others who are "location dependent". Lots of them run older cars and vans which are not compliant.
The Mayor's scheme (and the reasons he cites to defend it) are ridiculous. He's on record as saying that motorists of non-compliant vehicles are responsible for the deaths of 4,000 people". Well, whether that's true or not, apparently you can kill as many people as you like for £12.50 a day. As well as that, the "consultation exercise" that was supposed to support its introduction was nothing short of a sham and if he gets away with this, the next step, which is an open secret, is road pricing for all vehicles in the whole of London.
The Mayor is anti-car, though does not advertise too much that when he goes out anywhere there are three vehicles in a convoy to keep him safe.
But I don't know where Boris (presumably Johnson) fits in!
Yes Zacs. Many people - particularly trade people such as plumbers, carpenters, general builders and so on need to travel either into Greater London from outside or around it to conduct their business. They cannot get on a bus with all their tools and materials; they cannot go by push bike. As well as them there are shop workers, hospital staff and many others who are "location dependent". Lots of them run older cars and vans which are not compliant.
The Mayor's scheme (and the reasons he cites to defend it) are ridiculous. He's on record as saying that motorists of non-compliant vehicles are responsible for the deaths of 4,000 people". Well, whether that's true or not, apparently you can kill as many people as you like for £12.50 a day. As well as that, the "consultation exercise" that was supposed to support its introduction was nothing short of a sham and if he gets away with this, the next step, which is an open secret, is road pricing for all vehicles in the whole of London.
The Mayor is anti-car, though does not advertise too much that when he goes out anywhere there are three vehicles in a convoy to keep him safe.
But I don't know where Boris (presumably Johnson) fits in!
Not just tradespeople at all. Many will be one side of the line and have friends and relatives as well as work places just over the line.
Should all those people give up their friends, job and abondon their relatives or pay the £12.50 a day?
ULEZ is criminal and how a labour person is getting away with it is amazing since it will tend to be hard working labour voters (who tend to be paid at the lower end of the scale) who are hit hard.
Khan is a disgrace to the labour name.
Should all those people give up their friends, job and abondon their relatives or pay the £12.50 a day?
ULEZ is criminal and how a labour person is getting away with it is amazing since it will tend to be hard working labour voters (who tend to be paid at the lower end of the scale) who are hit hard.
Khan is a disgrace to the labour name.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.